Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 14:18 -0600 schrieb James Hawkins:
We generally have a policy of silence for the test suite unless a
failure occurrs.
Then we need to update many Tests, which do not respect this.
Why do you need to output the version tested?
I have a partial implemented
Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 14:18 -0600 schrieb James Hawkins:
We generally have a policy of silence for the test suite unless a
failure occurrs.
Then we need to update many Tests, which do not respect this.
+1.
On 1/18/06, Detlef Riekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 17.01.2006, 14:18 -0600 schrieb James Hawkins:
We generally have a policy of silence for the test suite unless a
failure occurrs.
Then we need to update many Tests, which do not respect this.
I agree, but that
Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2006, 13:28 -0600 schrieb James Hawkins:
There is one case where I think it's leaning towards the OK
side, though it still bugs me, and that is the
advpack:GetVersionFromFile tests.
This test is in the wrong File (file.c and tests/advpack.c).
There's really no way
On 1/18/06, Detlef Riekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 18.01.2006, 13:28 -0600 schrieb James Hawkins:
There is one case where I think it's leaning towards the OK
side, though it still bugs me, and that is the
advpack:GetVersionFromFile tests.
This test is in the wrong
On 1/17/06, Detlef Riekenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Changelog:
- winspool/tests: dump filename and version of the tested file
- use name for all includes
We generally have a policy of silence for the test suite unless a
failure occurrs. Why do you need to output the version tested
