[ANNOUNCE] WireGuard Snapshot `0.0.20180413` Available

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello, A new snapshot, `0.0.20180413`, has been tagged in the git repository. Please note that this snapshot is, like the rest of the project at this point in time, experimental, and does not consitute a real release that would be considered

Re: Question about peers count

The max is 1048576 per interface, but if this becomes a problem, I can increase this significantly. [PS: I'm back from holidays now and I'll be working through the mailing list backlog over the next few days.] ___ WireGuard mailing list

Re: Question about peers count

Hi Vyacheslav, Yes - Wireguard can handle that easily. >From one of Jason's posts earlier in the month: "I have a script I run during development that sets up thousands of interfaces, *each with **hundreds of thousands of peers* [...]" So ... you'll be fine :) E

Conflict with broadcom component.

I installed Wireguard on my Asus router. Some sites work but others slow or do not response. I tried adjust MTU but no luck. Kernel makes following error messages. Apr 1 16:17:43 kernel: ^[[0;33;41mBLOG ERROR blog_request :blog_key corruption when adding flow net_p=ffc0100cba60 dir=0

few wg peers over the same port in the main office? Cryptokey routing

First of all a BIG thanks to developers for great job! There is a main office with WG running on Lede reboot (17.01.4) with ports 51820 and 51821. Until I've two peers, one pointing to port 51820 and 2nd to 51821 everything worked fine. Now I want to add another one peer to have 3 remote peers

Re: [patch] add support for peer names using a file in userspace

On 8 December 2017 at 19:45, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Absolutely not. If something like this lands, it will be called > "Description=" or the like, as another attribute of a peer. There's no > reason to make the section parser more complicated, when this is > essentially just

Re: Working only one way

Hi Luis, On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ing. Luis Felipe Domínguez Vega wrote: > 1 - Can I change the length (to 4096 bits for example) of private key? or is > not neccesary, I am a little paranoic with this kind of security cipher. > No. WireGuard uses

Re: Working only one way

On 04/09/2018 10:17 PM, Ing. Luis Felipe Domínguez Vega wrote: Hello people, i currently installed wireguard (So easy !!), but i have a problem i have ping from server -> client, but not client -> server, when in server I execute tcpdump -i empresa only i see ICMP request and not

Re: Troubleshooting WireGuard connections

Hi Riccardo, Welcome! Not off-topic at all. Your config looks fine to my eyes; I don't think you _need_ different ports per endpoint, but I might be wrong. With your tcpdump, if you can see incoming ICMP requests you should see outgoing ones too -- make sure they're not coming in on wg0 and

Re: wg-ip, a tool to assign automatic ip addresses to wireguard interfaces

On 04/12/2018 01:42 PM, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote: Long story short, you need a proper central server that will find the next ip address, or you need to stick to ipv6 (and in that case the address space makes it pointless to do that check). I think one option is to use the

Re: wg-ip, a tool to assign automatic ip addresses to wireguard interfaces

On 12.04.2018 13:42, Christophe-Marie Duquesne wrote: > And for certain reasons I prefer to use ip4. I'd recommend a closer look at those reasons. In other words: whatever problem prevents you from using IPv6, get them fixed. -- -- Matthias Urlichs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP

Re: wg-ip, a tool to assign automatic ip addresses to wireguard interfaces

i once had written a script for some openWRT (lede) Routers for Freifunk, first of all, take ipV6 inside your tunnel, and mix localnet V6 Addresses with the MAC - this way you get a very distinct pair of V6 Address and Key This assumes that a Server has fixed ip and key. keyline in Setup is this

Re: wg-ip, a tool to assign automatic ip addresses to wireguard interfaces

Weird. Once again, I did not receive this answer and saw it on the online archive. from https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-April/002598.html: > > I could add this to the script, but I figured that for the number of > > peers I have and for the network ranges I am using, it is

Troubleshooting WireGuard connections

WireGuard doesn't always work with my devices. I ran out of options for troubleshooting it so I'm writing here, hoping for a stable solution. I see it's not a strict devel-only mailing list but if I'm off-topic I apologize in advance and I'll fade-out in the background, waiting for better

Re: wg-ip, a tool to assign automatic ip addresses to wireguard interfaces

> from https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2018-April/002595.html: > > PS: you write that the "tool does not handle collisions", but does it > > recognize and/or warn about them? I.e. if a peer with the newly > > suggested IP exists already - will it warn? > > No, no detection is