Wireguard server installed on CentOS 4.18.0-240.1.1.el8_3.x86_64
kmod-wireguard-1.0.20201221-1.el8_3.elrepo.x86_64
wireguard-tools-1.0.20200827-1.el8.x86_64
Since the versions released in september ?, I can see that wireguard is
unstable (before, it was working fine).
The connection is lost aft
I agree with this commentary and would second keeping the functionality.
Michael B. Williams
Glexia, Inc. - An IT Company
USA Direct: +1 978 477 6797
USA Toll Free: +1 800 675 0297 x101
AUS Direct: +61 3 8594 2265
AUS Toll Free: +61 1800 931 724 x101
Fax: +1.815-3
Thank you for this information.
Since Stream is more or less like a very old Fedora version now I am
convinced using Fedora Server wont be that bad at all.
Gonna test it soon.
On 1/4/21 10:55 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 7:48 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 4, 2
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:06 AM Silvan Nagl wrote:
>
> Thank you for this information.
> Since Stream is more or less like a very old Fedora version now I am
> convinced using Fedora Server wont be that bad at all.
>
> Gonna test it soon.
Yeah, I think you'll like it.
I got tired of dicking aroun
Jeffrey Walton writes:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 8:06 AM Silvan Nagl wrote:
>>
>> Thank you for this information.
>> Since Stream is more or less like a very old Fedora version now I am
>> convinced using Fedora Server wont be that bad at all.
>>
>> Gonna test it soon.
>
> Yeah, I think you'll li
Hi,
No I'm not sharing the private key with other machines
If I have an another machine, I use an another IP / Key ...
Today, I was able to investigate in my office. I connected my laptop to the
same LAN than the wireguard server. It worked fine with the ethernet cable.
Then I tried to connect o
Hi,
Is Fedora a rolling release so to speak? I remember they used to call fedora
the bleeding edge distro not really geared for production environments is that
still accurate. I have only used it as a work station desktop with KDE
installed.
Regards,
Jonathan
-Original Message-
From:
On 1/4/21 3:55 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> From an admin and developer perspective I find Fedora Server a real
> gem. Speaking from experience, I would much rather work on Fedora than
> CentOS or Red Hat. Fedora Server comes with the latest stable tools
> and does not need things like Software Col
On 1/5/21 5:25 AM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
> Is Fedora a rolling release so to speak? I remember they used to call
> fedora the bleeding edge distro not really geared for production
> environments is that still accurate. I have only used it as a work
> station desktop with KDE installed.
It has a
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 01:22:31PM +, Gijs Conijn wrote:
> That is what I am using the allowed IP's for
> I only want to route via the tunnel to my home LAN so I enter the WG subnet
> and the home LAN subnet in allowed IP's
> (As I understood Allowed IP's are not only Allowed but also routed v
On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 02:38:23PM +0100, Henning Reich wrote:
> Hi,
> you can control the traffic is routed with the AllowedIPs option. If
> you use 0.0.0.0/0, all traffic is routed through the wireguard tunnel.
> If you just allow for example 10.10.10.10/32 only 10.10.10.10 is
> allowed. 10.10.0.
On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:12:12 +0100
Chris Osicki wrote:
> As far as I can see after few tests, AllowedIPs config file option has
> nothing to do with routing and I hope
> it will stay like this.
wg-quick uses AllowedIPs to also set up matching entries in the system routing
table. This can be dis
On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:25:30AM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:12:12 +0100
> Chris Osicki wrote:
>
> > As far as I can see after few tests, AllowedIPs config file option has
> > nothing to do with routing and I hope
> > it will stay like this.
>
> wg-quick uses AllowedI
Hi Chris, you first post made it sound very much like a query on
wg-quick, it's mentioned in a way that implies you're using it.
"...My first try was with wg-quick, and noticed all my traffic went
through the WG-VPN connection.
It escapes me why. What is the idea behind this policy?
On my Linux b
On 1/5/21 3:13 PM, Chris Osicki wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 01:25:30AM +0500, Roman Mamedov wrote:
>> On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 21:12:12 +0100
>> Chris Osicki wrote:
>>
>>> As far as I can see after few tests, AllowedIPs config file option has
>>> nothing to do with routing and I hope
>>> it will
Can someone take me off this list?
I’ve tried like 4 times replying to the wireguard list and it says
Unsubscribed! And then comes back :(
> On Jan 5, 2021, at 6:50 PM, Phillip McMahon wrote:
>
> Hi Chris, you first post made it sound very much like a query on
> wg-quick, it's mentioned in a
16 matches
Mail list logo
