Hi,
I was asked to forward this to the list because the author has
problems reaching it.
It looks legit:
-- Forwarded message -
From: Marek Küthe
Hello,
the WireGuard logo is a Chinese dragon. Does he/she have a name? What
could you call him/her? The background is that I want
On Tue, 23 May 2023 at 19:07, 'Eric Dumazet' via syzkaller-bugs
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 7:05 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 7:01 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 09:47:36AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 23 May
On Tue, 8 Nov 2022 at 05:40, syzbot
wrote:
>
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit:3577a7611842 Merge branches 'for-next/acpi', 'for-next/kbu..
> git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git
> for-kernelci
> console
On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 7:02 AM Tetsuo Handa
wrote:
>
> On 2021/05/20 5:09, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:58 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >>
> >> On 5/19/21 12:48 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:35 P
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 9:58 PM Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> On 5/19/21 12:48 PM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 7:35 PM syzbot
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> syzbot found the following issue on:
> >>
> >
On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 4:44 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 9:24 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > Strictly saying, 0.15% is for delaying the newly added item only. This
> > is not a problem, we c
do a CAS loop on enqueued.
Since any modifications to dequeued can only lead to reduction of
size, we don't need to double check it before CAS, thus the CAS loop
should provide a precise upper bound on size.
Or, we could check, opportunistically increment, and then decrement if
overflow, but that look
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 7:15 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > FTR, I've disabled the following UBSAN configs:
> > > > UBSAN_MISC
> > > > UBSAN_DIV_ZERO
> > > > UBSAN_BOOL
> > > > UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE
> > > > UBSAN_SIGNED_OVERFLOW
> > > > UBSAN_UNSIGNED_OVERFLOW
> > > > UBSAN_ENUM
> > > >
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 6:35 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:20 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > ...
> > FTR, I've disabled the following UBSAN configs:
> > UBSAN_MISC
> > UBSAN_DIV_ZERO
> > UBSAN_BOOL
> > UBSAN_OBJECT_SIZE
> > U
On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 10:46 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:26 PM Kees Cook wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:00 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Hi Dmitry,
> >> > > >
> &g
On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 9:26 PM Kees Cook wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:00 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi Dmitry,
>> > > >
>> > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:14 AM Dmitry Vyukov
>> &g
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:06 PM Jeffrey Walton wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 2:03 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 1:22 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 12:23
On Thu, Jan 7, 2021 at 8:00 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 10:14 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > > Hi Jason,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for looking into this.
> > &g
On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 10:11 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hmm, on first glance, I'm not sure I'm seeing the bug:
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 5:54 PM syzbot
> wrote:
> > UBSAN: object-size-mismatch in ./include/linux/skbuff.h:2021:28
> > member access within address 85889cc2 with
On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 5:34 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 5:14 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > I got some coverage in wg_netdevice_notification:
> > https://imgur.com/a/1sJZKtp
> >
> > Or you mean the parts that are st
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 11:00 AM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > I've added descriptions for wireguard packets:
> > https://github.com/google/syzkaller/commit/012fbc3229ebef871a201ea431b16610e6e0d345
> > It give
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 8:24 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:42 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Observation:
> > > >
> > > > It seems to be starting to synthesize packets sent to the wireguard
> > >
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:42 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> > >
> > > Observation:
> > >
> > > It seems to be starting to synthesize packets sent to the wireguard
> > > socket. These aren't the proper handshake packets generated internally
> > > b
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 4:19 PM Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:44 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> >
> > Observation:
> >
> > It seems to be starting to synthesize packets sent to the wireguard
> > socket. These aren't the proper ha
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 12:44 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Observation:
>
> It seems to be starting to synthesize packets sent to the wireguard
> socket. These aren't the proper handshake packets generated internally
> by that triangle commit, but rather ones that syzkaller creates
> itself.
On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 10:39 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Hey Dmitry,
>
> I see you got wireguard's netlink stuff hooked up to syzkaller.
> Excellent work, and thanks! It's already finding bugs.
>
> Right now it seems to know about 5 different keys you've come up with,
> and not much in the
21 matches
Mail list logo
