yesterday i shortly tested this with tplink 841 and LEDE FW, these smaller embedded Router System (as mentioned some emails before)
and we got 30 Mbit Through in on direction and 11-14 the other. (which doesnt make so much sense to me - but i hadnt time to debug this, or find out more) so that as short notice ;) - iperf3 Test (tcp - with/out reverse and - server/client changed) |[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 13.9 MBytes 11.6 Mbits/sec receiver [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.06 sec 38.7 MBytes 32.3 Mbits/sec 50 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.06 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec receiver [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 5] 0.00-10.03 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 5] 0.00-10.03 sec 14.2 MBytes 11.8 Mbits/sec receiver [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 38.3 MBytes 32.1 Mbits/sec 40 sender [ 4] 0.00-10.00 sec 37.9 MBytes 31.8 Mbits/sec receiver [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth [ 4] 0.00-4.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec sender [ 4] 0.00-4.00 sec 6.78 MBytes 14.2 Mbits/sec receiver [ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth Retr [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 38.7 MBytes 32.4 Mbits/sec 46 sender [ 5] 0.00-10.04 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec receiver| https://forum.freifunk.net/t/lede-test-wireguard-und-blanko-durchsatz-tp841nv11-1-und-bug/13163/11 On 01.10.2016 01:34, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > Hello, > > A new experimental snapshot, `experimental-0.0.20161001`, has been > tagged in > the git repository. > > Please note that this snapshot is, like the rest of the project at > this point > in time, experimental, and does not consitute a real release that would be > considered secure and bug-free. However, if you'd like to test this > snapshot > out, there are a few relevent changes. > > == Changes == > > * poly1305: optimize unaligned access > > This is a very appreciated fix from René van Dorst, adjusting the > arithmetic > in Poly1305 to work fast on platforms with slow unaligned access, > such as > MIPS. According to his calculation, this gives a 50% improvement on > small MIPS > boxes. > > * hashtables: use rdrand() instead of counter > > Rather than incrementing a counter, we instead use rdrand, which > gives us an > extremely fast source of random numbers. We're still running this > through > siphash with a secret, so a backdoored rdrand implementation won't be a > problem. > > * examples: add nat-hole-punching > > https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2016-August/000372.html > > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/contrib/examples/nat-hole-punching/README > > * examples: add key extractor > > https://lists.zx2c4.com/pipermail/wireguard/2016-August/000373.html > > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/tree/contrib/examples/extract-keys/README > > * tools: allow multiple AllowedIPs invocations > > Multiple AllowedIPs= lines can now be specified, which could improve > readability of the config files. > > * send: properly encapsulate ECN > > Thanks to the guidance of Dave Taht, we now support ECN. > > * Rework headers and includes > * compat: Isolate more functions > > In anticipation of upstreaming WireGuard, we've now moved most of our > version-specific #ifdefs to compat.h, where we use horrible macro > tricks to > redefine functions for old versions. This allows us to keep the > actual code as > clean as possible. When we merge to mainline, compat.h will be deleted > wholesale. > > * tests: test jumbo frames with more transfer > * tests: add crypto-RP filter test > * qemu: enhancements > > With this an numerous other commits, we've further expanded the test > suite. > > As always, the source is available at https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/ and > information about the project is available at https://www.wireguard.io/ . > > This snapshot is available in tarball form here: > > https://git.zx2c4.com/WireGuard/snapshot/WireGuard-experimental-0.0.20161001.tar.xz > SHA256: ac3abb7b940716ac12b96a2cb3f7666598cbefd26f19c268f627dc47cd113ac8 > > If you're a snapshot package maintainer, please bump your package > version. If > you're a user, the WireGuard team welcomes any and all feedback on > this latest > snapshot. > > Thank you, > Jason Donenfeld > > > _______________________________________________ > WireGuard mailing list > > WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com > http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard -- make the world nicer, please use PGP encryption
_______________________________________________ WireGuard mailing list WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard