Thanks very much to everybody, like always professional and straight to the
point!
One of the best ml ever :)
Cheers,
Gianluca
___
WireGuard mailing list
WireGuard@lists.zx2c4.com
https://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/wireguard
Allowed-ips plays a variety of roles which at different times can be
mapped to several traditional network roles but one it doesn't really
play the role of routing table. Instead they act as a forwarding
information base for the wireguard interface matching ip addresses to
peers. Wireguard then mak
> WireGuard *does* support overlapping ranges of AllowedIPs on different
peers. It
> doesn't support having *identical* ranges of AllowedIPs on different
peers,
> which was the situation here. (You're correct, there's no concept of a
metric.)
Oh good - looks like I just misunderstood your ordinal
Hello,
On 03/15/18 13:39, Steve Gilberd wrote:
>> Allowed IPs is like a routing table; you can't have two routes for the same
> set of IPs
>
> If this is the case, then wireguard does not have proper routing support.
>
> Normally, routing tables allow both multiple and overlapping routes present
> Allowed IPs is like a routing table; you can't have two routes for the
same set of IPs
If this is the case, then wireguard does not have proper routing support.
Normally, routing tables allow both multiple and overlapping routes
present. When making routing decisions, the most-specific route is
Hello,
On 03/15/18 10:31, Gianluca Gabrielli wrote:
> I was setting two peers on the server, but every time I re-add one of these
> two the other one is shown with (none) on "allowed ips" field. Of course that
> blocks communications with that peer. If I try to re-add it, then the other
> peer lo
Hi folks,
I was setting two peers on the server, but every time I re-add one of these two
the other one is shown with (none) on "allowed ips" field. Of course that
blocks communications with that peer.
If I try to re-add it, then the other peer loses its configuration, same
problem.
I also up
