It's almost certainly the iPhone that's the slow part. The wireguard
implementation on iOS is running in userspace.
--FC
> On Jun 1, 2022, at 7:40 AM, Houman wrote:
>
> Thanks Roman.
>
>> So did you apply both of that, and what was the effect?
>
> I will create a new environment this
Thanks Roman.
> So did you apply both of that, and what was the effect?
I will create a new environment this afternoon and test the MTU
changes mentioned earlier and investigate the outcome.
> What are the other point that you test against, is it another VPS (better if
> you could try with
On Wed, 1 Jun 2022 10:07:31 +0100
Houman wrote:
> I didn't change the MTU settings, but I have a suspicion about MTU. I
> found this article here that makes some interesting suggestions to set
> MTU to 1280: https://keremerkan.net/posts/wireguard-mtu-fixes/
>
> And beyond that iptables -A
Thanks for your reply.
I have run htop to observe the CPU consumption during this test, and
the CPU(s) go up only to 10-20%. So the CPU doesn't seem to be the
bottleneck.
I didn't change the MTU settings, but I have a suspicion about MTU. I
found this article here that makes some interesting
Den ons 1 juni 2022 kl 09:49 skrev Houman :
> Hello,
> I'm compiling the latest stable Wireguard on Debian 11.
> git clone https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-tools
> make -C wireguard-tools/src -j$(nproc)
> sudo make -C wireguard-tools/src install
>
> However the speed is not that impressive. I have
Hello,
I'm compiling the latest stable Wireguard on Debian 11.
git clone https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-tools
make -C wireguard-tools/src -j$(nproc)
sudo make -C wireguard-tools/src install
However the speed is not that impressive. I have a VPS with 4 vCores
and 8 GB RAM on 1 Gbps network.
