Hi All,
Reporting back on my progress after modify MTUs. Still seeing
significant intermittent stuck /hung connections on iOS in a
Wireguard over Wireguard tunnel (most apparent when using Twitter app for iOS)
Looking at getting Wireshark setup to do some debugging this afternoon
and would also
Althea uses WireGuard over WireGuard for mesh routing. Each device maintains a
link to peers using WireGuard and then also maintains it's connection to the
exit over a multihop WireGuard connection.
Building working WireGuard tunnels over fe80 ipv6 link local addresses was a
real pain. Pa
Hi all,
for my enlightenment can you please advise in which situation such
setups are useful?
Thanks!
На чт, 7.05.2020 г. в 4:01 Derrick Lyndon Pallas написа:
>
> Note for the list: IPv6 has a minimum of 1280, which means 1360 in the
> outer layer. ~Derrick
>
>
> On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Jason A. Do
Wireguard is defaulting to 1420 MTU, the ethernet adapter is 1500 MTU,
and I have IPv6 completely disabled.
Can/should the MTU of wireguard be bumped to 1440?
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 6:26 PM Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:24 PM Justin Kilpatrick wrote:
> >
> > > 1340 or 1
Note for the list: IPv6 has a minimum of 1280, which means 1360 in the
outer layer. ~Derrick
On 5/6/20 4:54 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:28 PM John Lauro wrote:
Wireguard is defaulting to 1420 MTU, the ethernet adapter is 1500 MTU,
and I have IPv6 completely disable
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 5:28 PM John Lauro wrote:
>
> Wireguard is defaulting to 1420 MTU, the ethernet adapter is 1500 MTU,
> and I have IPv6 completely disabled.
>
> Can/should the MTU of wireguard be bumped to 1440?
You could if you wanted. But if you don't do it perfectly on all sides
with tot
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:24 PM Justin Kilpatrick wrote:
>
> > 1340 or 1360
>
> Why two options? I've been using 1340 for a long time.
WireGuard over IPv4 has a 60 byte overhead. WireGuard over IPv6 has an
80 byte overhead.
> 1340 or 1360
Why two options? I've been using 1340 for a long time.
--
Justin Kilpatrick
jus...@althea.net
On Wed, May 6, 2020, at 6:00 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:37 PM Mo Balaa wrote:
> >
> > Was hoping setting them both to automatic would just work; but a
On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 3:37 PM Mo Balaa wrote:
>
> Was hoping setting them both to automatic would just work; but after
> some fiddling that appears to be the issue.
>
> What is the optimal MTU for the inner WireGuard tunnel if the outer
> one is set 1420?
1340 or 1360
d your MTUs? ~Derrick
>
>
> On 5/6/20 9:57 AM, Mo Balaa wrote:
> > We are running WireGuard over WireGuard. It appears to work well;
> > however I am noticing some applications struggle to work reliably.
> > Lots of failed page loadss / timeouts. Any pointers on how I c
Have you checked your MTUs? ~Derrick
On 5/6/20 9:57 AM, Mo Balaa wrote:
We are running WireGuard over WireGuard. It appears to work well;
however I am noticing some applications struggle to work reliably.
Lots of failed page loadss / timeouts. Any pointers on how I could go
about debugging
We are running WireGuard over WireGuard. It appears to work well;
however I am noticing some applications struggle to work reliably.
Lots of failed page loadss / timeouts. Any pointers on how I could go
about debugging these issues?
Any general pointers on running WireGuard over WireGuard? One
12 matches
Mail list logo
