Re: more specific routes for IPs added to "AllowedIPs =" ?

2020-10-01 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 15:42:19 -0700 PGNet Dev wrote: > I've two linux machines connected with wg. > > Machine #1 is a remote VM, & connects to the public 'net. > > Machine #2 is local, on my LAN. > > To date, they've only routed internal traffic. Nice -n- easy. > > I'm adding forwarding of

Re: more specific routes for IPs added to "AllowedIPs =" ?

2020-10-01 Thread PGNet Dev
On 10/1/20 6:07 AM, B K E wrote: > it's probably the easiest to let wg-quick do its work, then by hand modify > the routes so they are correct, and then put the necessary route commands in > a PostUp script. yep. Once I figured out that on _linux_, turning OFF auto-route generation is done

more specific routes for IPs added to "AllowedIPs =" ?

2020-10-01 Thread PGNet Dev
I've two linux machines connected with wg. Machine #1 is a remote VM, & connects to the public 'net. Machine #2 is local, on my LAN. To date, they've only routed internal traffic. Nice -n- easy. I'm adding forwarding of specific EXTERNAL traffic from the 'net, received at Machine #1, to