Good morning, Jason!
On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 00:50, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> Hey Rui,
>
> I fixed it! It turned out to be caused by -fvisibility=hidden undoing
> the effect of the binutils fix from a while back. Here's the patch
> that makes the problem go away:
>
> https://git.zx2c4.com/wire
Hey Rui,
I fixed it! It turned out to be caused by -fvisibility=hidden undoing
the effect of the binutils fix from a while back. Here's the patch
that makes the problem go away:
https://git.zx2c4.com/wireguard-linux-compat/commit/?id=178cdfffb99f2fd6fb4a5bfd2f9319461d93f53b
This will be in the n
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:33:49PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> So, some more research: it looks like the R_ARM_THM_JUMP11 symbol is
> actually wg_packet_send_staged_packets, a boring C function with
> nothing fancy about it. That github issue you pointed to suggested
> that it might have som
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 02:45:12PM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Looks like my explanation there wasn't 100% accurate, but it does seem
> like the issue occurs when gcc sees a clear tail call that it can
> optimize into a B instruction instead of a BL instruction.
>
> The below patch avoids t
