NDA or not.NO WAY to the biz plan would be my vote
Chuck Moses
High Desert Wireless Broadband Communication
16922 Airport Blvd # 3
Mojave CA 93501
661 824 3431 office
818 406 6818 cell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dan Metcalf
Sent
Hey Matt - give me a call tomorrow morning please - 1-800-774-0320
JohnnyO
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Liotta
Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 4:16 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?
We have certainl
if need be, post a bond.
Aubrey Wells wrote:
How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their
business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other lease
agreement you enter in to (car, house, apartment, whatever) they want to
make sure you can pay up before t
Title: Message
All ya
can do in this case is replace it and laugh it off :)
I have
extra feed arms - will send ya a couple ! :)
JohnnyO
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Scott ReedSent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 7:48
PM
Scott,
Ouch! I would assume customer paid for the antenna?
Thanks,
Dawn
Scott Reed wrote:
Customer tried to improve signal by cutting a tree limb that was in
front of antenna:
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/10/05/katrina.tech.response.ap/index.html
pretty cool article...:)
-
Jeff
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Hi George,
Is this what you are referring to?
http://www.verio.com/about/newsroom/pr/index.cfm?fuseaction=press&Year=04&id=249751102013222
Cogent and Verio do have business relationships and that is probably
one of the reasons why they chose to use them as a transit provider.
I don't think that i
Cogent recently bought or took over some of Verrio's business, maybe
this has to do with that?
George
Tony Weasler wrote:
To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated
between L3 and Cogent. There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is
blocking Cogent traffic through Cogen
Depends on the value of the roof top. Basically if they are asking for
this, it is because in the past, 90% of their tenants never paid their roof
rent because of bankruptcies and such. They just want to be certain that
they can count on you succeeding, so they get paid. By giving them a
busi
I would offer them credit references, your landlord, suppliers that you
have net 10 or net 30 accounts with and so on.
Nothing more.
Blair
Aubrey Wells wrote:
How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their
business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other
How is it none of their business? The business plan is none of their
business, but the financials certainly are. Just like any other lease
agreement you enter in to (car, house, apartment, whatever) they want to
make sure you can pay up before they give you the lease.
-Original Message-
Fr
None of their business. We had a request like this, and claimed that it was
unfair business practice, and the landlord dropped their request for such
information.
Probably ended up costing us that extra $100 / month but our financial
statements are no one's business.
-Original Message--
Did you do an NDA? What type of financial documents did provide?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Matt Liotta
> Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2005 5:16 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] rooftop leasing?
>
> We have cert
We have certainly had landlords question us financially, but none have
ever asked for a business plan.
-Matt
Dan Metcalf wrote:
Aftering spending almost 8 weeks trying to get a lease with a rooftop provider,
they come back at us with a request for a business plan and financial statement
befor
Aftering spending almost 8 weeks trying to get a lease with a rooftop provider,
they come back at us with a request for a business plan and financial statement
before going forward ---
Thoughts? Has anybody had a request like this before? We haven't
Thanks
Dan
> -Original Message-
> Fr
On 10/6/2005 1:03 PM, Tom DeReggi created:
>> To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated
>> between L3 and Cogent.
>
> I heard otherwise, however I can't prove that.
Cogent on their own web site said that agreements were not violated:
"Level 3 terminated its peering with Cog
To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated
between L3 and Cogent.
I heard otherwise, however I can't prove that.
>There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is
blocking Cogent traffic through Cogent's Verio transit (which Cogent
pays $$ for.)
There was evidence. I wis
Here you go:
http://ct.zdnet.com.com/clicks?c=530414-23845546&brand=zdnet&ds=5&fs=0
George wrote:
Hi Tom
Do you have a url for this news?
Thanks
George
Tom DeReggi wrote:
For those that are not aware, Level-3 vilolated its inplace
agreements, and blocked all peering connections from Cogent
To set the record straight, no peering agreements were violated
between L3 and Cogent. There is also no confirmed evidence that L3 is
blocking Cogent traffic through Cogent's Verio transit (which Cogent
pays $$ for.) It appears that Cogent is unwilling to use this route
because it would force the
Hi Tom
Do you have a url for this news?
Thanks
George
Tom DeReggi wrote:
For those that are not aware, Level-3 vilolated its inplace agreements,
and blocked all peering connections from Cogent communications yesterday
(October 5th), and rumor has it that they are also now blocking all
Cogent
For those that are not aware, Level-3 vilolated its inplace agreements, and
blocked all peering connections from Cogent communications yesterday (October
5th), and rumor has it that they are also now blocking all Cogent assigned
IP ranges, so that routing diverse paths won't be effective. N
Yes, But I don't believe it. Its not likely they have an average ARPU of
$400 a sub.
But then again, maybe I'm wrong.
If they really had $1,200,000 a month revenue, thats $14,000,000 a year, and
they got screwed on the deal.
Thats only a 2x annual revenue sell out, a way low evaluation unde
A perfect reason why Municipality is a VERY bad
thing.
The top contender bidders were large super
companies willing to spend lots of money, in exchange for the marketing
benefit. Basically publuc Ride of ways, that Small independent WISPs have
had to fight tooth and nail to gain access to w
I read your arttical and your name caught my eye I was wondering if you are kin to a Al Dearman in White Castle La. if you are please contact me he was a very dear friend. I know he had a brother in Mississippi .He was like a older brother my e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED] thanks so much.
Yahoo! for
http://q1.schwab.com/content/rb/2005/10/04/1136855.html
5:52 PM ET 10/04/05
Earthlink to build Philadelphia
wireless network
NEW YORK, Oct 4
(Reuters) - Internet service provider EarthLink Inc. plans to build a city-wide
wireless network for Philadelphia to provide residents and busin
25 matches
Mail list logo