We use bandwidth shaping on *nix. works fine. currently the profile for
one site manages 500+ IP based up and downstream. Its one of our few
home-brew items. Of course, its all open source, so I don't need to
worry about support on this particular item.
John Thomas wrote:
Mark, go over to
Matt Larsen - Lists wrote:
> Our mail server locked up on Wednesday afternoon with some hard drive
> weirdness.
>snip snip
> except for
> the 26 hours that the mail server was not accepting email.
>
> However, our Barracuda box was accepting the messages and storing them.
> After a phone call
We were doing quite a bit with our 3640 but from my experience the box
did not hold up well under load. Be cautious when considering doing
traffic shaping with your 3640. Watch the memory and CPU load closely.
Scriv
John Thomas wrote:
Mark, go over to http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html#du
Mark, go over to http://www.mikrotik.com/download.html#dude
See if it does some/all of what you need.
As for limiting/shaping, your 3640 may do what you need.
John
Mark Nash wrote:
I'm at the point on my network now that I really need to control
unnecessary bandwidth usage. The biggest pro
Yeah, I still can imagine why there are some wips still homebrewing gear
that ends up more expensive that wisp-engineered products on the market like
canopy, trango ect...
We were in a same spot with some 11b gear deployed in some areas... last
august we decided to just cough up some cash and cha
