Lonnie,
I have published a Certification FAQ
http://ask-wi.com/certification.html
that I believe addresses all of these questions.
WISPA also has a Certification email list to further address these
issues. That list is currently open only to WISPA members.
Regarding using a copy of someone
Are you sure about this? Is this what ADI told you, personally?
The Original Manufacturer assembles a system and has it certified with
that set of components and construction techniques. As long as the
SAME parts and SAME techniques are used then this system should be
certified. Of course the
Jonathon,
Hit me offlist if there is a configuration change you would like to see in
the list-server setup. I'm not sure I follow your email completely.
Rick Harnish
President
OnlyInternet Broadband & Wireless, Inc.
260-827-2482
Founding Member of WISPA
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Doesn't work that way. Those entities are called commercial, educational
etc. As a rule, only a wisp would be called a wisp on the books.
All customers are classified.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Pete Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, April 2
Matt,
Is this latest news? The last I heard was adi had certified their board in
their enclosure with a couple different antennas, but never heard what OS
they were running. Also, to be certified you would have to purchase the
units pre-assembled from ADI.
Remember the certification goes to t
OK. I stand corrected. But that's not Mikrotik, either.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 7:23 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5GHz Amps
Wrong.
ADI Engineering has a certifie
Wrong.
ADI Engineering has a certified StarOS/War Board combo, with a choice of
cards. I am currently evaluating them for my future backhauls.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
Smith, Rick wrote:
Nope, not FCC certified. What Mikrotik / Star-OS systems are ? None.
-Original Message-
Fr
If we're to take some of what's been published literally, all "wisp
equipment" providers are going to be required to be CALEA "compliant".
This is going to lead to some serious compatibility and interoperability
issues, if you ask me. HOW equipment maker A, B, and C accomplish stuff is
likely go
I used to be, Mac.
The "why not now" is not to be aired in public.
- Original Message -
From: "Mac Dearman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 1:00 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] FCC Admits Mistakes In Measuring Broadband Competition
> Mark,
>
>
> A
- Original Message -
From: "John Scrivner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Admits Mistakes In Measuring Broadband Competition
> Mark,
> As the "driver of the bus" I feel compelled to reply. You certainly do a
>
Gladly John,
We're excited to be exhibiting at ISPCON Spring 2007: LaunchPad Pavilion J.
And we want to see you there! We have negotiated a special rate for
our clients and partners so you can save big on your ISPCON full-conference
registration. But that is only the start, please read on...
ISP
Mark,
Are you a paid WISPA member?
Mac Dearman
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Koskenmaki
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Admits Mistakes In Measuring Broa
Our WISPA list server does a nice job of including the original header after
the words "on behalf of"...which incorporates the original list author's
e-mail address. Not all do but the WISPA server does. But it won't shoe up
in a forward, usually, just by reading the original.
. . . j o n a t h
Mark,
As the "driver of the bus" I feel compelled to reply. You certainly do a
god job of selling your ideas. I could almost decide to mutiny along
with you if I did not believe that part of doing business is to obey the
laws of the land.
So far the government of the United States has asked s
Jack Unger, contact me offlist, pls. I forget your email addy...
Got a couple of pertinent questions for you.
R
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
Nope. I still won't fill it out.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of John Thomas
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 2:58 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Admits Mistakes In Measuring Broadband
Competition
Pete, you hit on an inter
Nope, not FCC certified. What Mikrotik / Star-OS systems are ? None.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dawn DiPietro
Sent: Sunday, April 22, 2007 11:15 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] 5GHz Amps
Rick,
Can you tell me if th
Pete, you hit on an interesting idea. What if the FCC were to pay the
ISP say $500 each year to fill out the 477? Would more ISP's participate?
John
Pete Davis wrote:
12000, 6000, 2000, or whatever number of WISPs is mainly hard to
quantify because there are LOTS of 2 and 3 customer private wi
Frank Muto has set up a deal where your entry to ISPCON is practically
free when you consider the free 100% WISPA dues payment he will make on
your behalf. An exhibit pass is free when you use a code from WISPA,
Frank or Peter. I think ImageStream has a free exhibit hall pass code
also. I don't
The solid dishes are much better than the grids. The 26db grids are
pretty decent, but the 29db grids (both PacWireless and Equinox) are
poor compared to the solid dish 29db antennas. I saw an 8db improvement
in signal switching from a 29db grid to a 29db solid dish antenna at a
couple of my
Peter, your intended meaning for the word...and what I assumed you meant,
were pretty much the same. I am not "offended" by it, so no worries.
You stated something that I was hoping you'd reveal... it goes something
like this, the regulators are in pursuit of "control or cooperation". I'd
like
My expeirence is that the grids are on par, gain-wise, with the solid
dishes. The solid dishes have MANY RF advantages, but a 26 db grid will do
26 db and 29 dish will do 29.
the solid dishes have advantages in stability, beam accuracy, front/back
ratio, and so on. But the gain is the gain, it
Does anyone have some real-world experience comparing the grid with the
solid 5.8 antennas.
Is the listed gain accurate in describing performance? or are there
additional advantages of the solid dish at equivalent gain ratings?
I have only installed grid at this point, due to local high wind
consid
Rick,
Can you tell me if this system you suggested is FCC Certified?
Regards,
Dawn DiPietro
Smith, Rick wrote:
use an XR5 (ubiquity) card as radios, with mikrotik, a 24 dbi panel on
the aesthetic end from pac wireless.
3' dish on the other end. You'll have more than enough margin.
Don't eve
Mark,
A well written piece.
However, I think you miss my point:
"Either we defend ourselves, and we defend the "cowboys" as Peter likes to
call people like me by rising in opposition to ANY regulatory garbage that
puts us under their thumb... Or we've just killed our whole industry."
You talk
Now you did it Pete, some one will get wind of that idea and pose it to his
boss in a effort to move up the ladder. Seriously tho, Ive felt the way things
were being funded by RUS were kinda like that. I saw a state loan go to a
company once that totally abused it. It was a case of the right hand
Thanks for reading my stuff!
Pics of some of you people are here:
http://virtual-cio.com/wispa/facebook/
Regards,
Peter Radizeski
RAD-INFO, Inc.
www.rad-info.net
www.marketingideaguy.com
George Rogato wrote:
Your too quick Rick!
I was checking out phone+ mag online and there he was:
http:
12000, 6000, 2000, or whatever number of WISPs is mainly hard to
quantify because there are LOTS of 2 and 3 customer private wireless
networks, where a business will buy a T1, DSL or whatever, and share it
wirelessly with a few nearby business, within or without the terms of
service agreements.
28 matches
Mail list logo
