Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499

Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? Sam Tetherow Sandhills Wireless Mike Hammett wrote: If you have equipment, you fill it out. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem

If it is the ethernet side I would check the ethernet cabling to make sure you didn't kink it when stringing the wire or got a bad end on it. Also depending on what you are plugging the ethernet into you may want to turn off auto negotiate or set the rate manually if you have the capability

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499

Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499

Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477? - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Sam Tetherow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM Subject: Re:

Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 499

Sam Tetherow wrote: Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)? No; it covers any telecommunication services that are regulated by the FCC. -Matt WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/

Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem

Happens to frequently for it to be the watch dog, but the watchdog is off. On Nov 16, 2007 5:26 PM, Mark Nash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: watchdog rebooting the device? Mark Nash UnwiredOnline.Net 350 Holly Street Junction City, OR 97448 http://www.uwol.net 541-998- 541-998-5599 fax

Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem

Bad radio or multipath. Move it up or down by as little as 2', but you may have to move as far as 10' futher up or further down. Look for ground, trees, power lines, buildings etc. NEAR the path. laters, marlon - Original Message - From: Andrew Niemantsverdriet [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem

Hello Our experience with LS2 with Advanced-Rate Algorithm which is default with Optimistic, used to cause packet loss by pinging from PC1 to PC2, while with rest as default setting for indoor environment. once such Opt is changed to other option then we did not feel packet loss. PC1

Re: [WISPA] PowerStation2 Problem

Replace the unit. I've seen 2 like that. Sam Tetherow wrote: If it is the ethernet side I would check the ethernet cabling to make sure you didn't kink it when stringing the wire or got a bad end on it. Also depending on what you are plugging the ethernet into you may want to turn off

[WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks

http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008052.html -- Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. FCC License # PG-12-25133 Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 Author of the WISP Handbook - Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs True Vendor-Neutral Wireless

[WISPA] PacWireless Sector

I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7

Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector

Hi, We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable. Travis Microserv Mike Hammett wrote: I'm looking (again) at

Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector

I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them deployed are 100% Tranzeo (AP radio, antenna, and CPE). Ryan On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:34 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote: Hi, We have used a LOT of

Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector

No, PacWireless doesn't sell a h-pol 2.4ghz sector. I checked before I bought the Tranzeo. Travis Microserv Ryan Langseth wrote: I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them deployed are

Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks

Like we didn't see it comming :-) The key statement I saw was... no more investment, unless a change in model, or something like that. What Earthlinks should be doing is staying focused on help desk support, content, and value add, partnering with existing providers that have models that

Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector

http://www.pacwireless.com/products/sector.shtml - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com - Original Message - From: Travis Johnson To: WISPA General List Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:46 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector

RE: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks

They never did get the problems sorted out with the new orleans network. Maybe they just got tired of people complaining about the free service not working. Most of the complaints here seemed to be low penetration of houses/buildings and dhcp issues. Now, If they would just unplug everything I

Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector

Sorry, I forgot when I was looking I needed a 120 degree h-pol sector. And I don't really like their antenna config (bottom stand-off style mounting) for a sector. It works great for an omni, but sectors should mount in the middle directly behind the antenna if possible. Travis Microserv

Re: [WISPA] EarthLink Says No More Money for Existing Muni Networks

Can you imagine trying to partner with 500 WISP's around the country? What a nightmare. Different equipment, different troubleshooting, different everything. It would never work. Travis Microserv Tom DeReggi wrote: Like we didn't see it comming :-) The key statement I saw was... no more