Can you imagine trying to partner with 500 WISP's around the country?
What a nightmare. Different equipment, different troubleshooting,
different everything. It would never work.
Travis
Microserv
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Like we didn't see it comming :-)
The key statement I saw was... "no more inv
Sorry, I forgot when I was looking I needed a 120 degree h-pol sector.
And I don't really like their antenna config (bottom stand-off style
mounting) for a sector. It works great for an omni, but sectors should
mount in the middle directly behind the antenna if possible.
Travis
Microserv
Mike
They never did get the problems sorted out with the new orleans network.
Maybe they just got tired of people complaining about the free service not
working. Most of the complaints here seemed to be low penetration of
houses/buildings and dhcp issues. Now, If they would just unplug everything
I cou
http://www.pacwireless.com/products/sector.shtml
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: Travis Johnson
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 5:46 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] PacWireless Sector
N
Like we didn't see it comming :-)
The key statement I saw was... "no more investment, unless a change in
model", or something like that.
What Earthlinks should be doing is staying focused on help desk support,
content, and value add, partnering with existing providers that have models
that wor
No, PacWireless doesn't sell a h-pol 2.4ghz sector. I checked before I
bought the Tranzeo.
Travis
Microserv
Ryan Langseth wrote:
I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had
good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them
deployed are 100%
I think Tranzeo H. Sectors are Pac Wireless Antennas? We have also had
good luck with Tranzeo Sectors, although the towers where we have them
deployed are 100% Tranzeo (AP radio, antenna, and CPE).
Ryan
On Sat, 2007-11-17 at 16:34 -0700, Travis Johnson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have used a LOT of Pa
Hi,
We have used a LOT of PacWireless 2.4ghz horizontal omni's and they work
great. I have never used any PacWireless 2.4ghz sectors, but we do have
some Tranzeo 2.4ghz sectors (horizontal) that work good and are affordable.
Travis
Microserv
Mike Hammett wrote:
I'm looking (again) at puttin
I'm looking (again) at putting up another tower. The tower I have now is 5 GHz
with two sectors of PacWireless and MTI. The MTI ones are outperforming the
PacWireless ones, but I have never really looked into it. It could be because
I bought a 5.4 GHz band antenna so I could do 5.3 or 5.7 wit
http://wifinetnews.com/archives/008052.html
--
Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
FCC License # PG-12-25133
Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-T
Replace the unit.
I've seen 2 like that.
Sam Tetherow wrote:
If it is the ethernet side I would check the ethernet cabling to make
sure you didn't kink it when stringing the wire or got a bad end on it.
Also depending on what you are plugging the ethernet into you may want
to turn off au
Hello
Our experience with LS2 with Advanced->Rate Algorithm which is default with
"Optimistic", used to cause packet loss by pinging from PC1 to PC2, while
with rest as default setting for indoor environment. once such "Opt" is
changed to other option then we did not feel packet loss.
PC
Bad radio or multipath.
Move it up or down by as little as 2', but you may have to move as far as
10' futher up or further down.
Look for ground, trees, power lines, buildings etc. NEAR the path.
laters,
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Niemantsverdriet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Happens to frequently for it to be the watch dog, but the watchdog is off.
On Nov 16, 2007 5:26 PM, Mark Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> watchdog rebooting the device?
>
> Mark Nash
> UnwiredOnline.Net
> 350 Holly Street
> Junction City, OR 97448
> http://www.uwol.net
> 541-998-
> 541-998-55
Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 49
Perhaps, I may have confused it with 477?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Sam Tetherow" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Saturday, November 17, 2007 12:16 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Form 49
Sam Tetherow wrote:
Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)?
No; it covers any telecommunication services that are regulated by the FCC.
-Matt
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
---
If it is the ethernet side I would check the ethernet cabling to make
sure you didn't kink it when stringing the wire or got a bad end on it.
Also depending on what you are plugging the ethernet into you may want
to turn off auto negotiate or set the rate manually if you have the
capability on
Isn't the 499 only for voice (traditional or VOIP)?
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Mike Hammett wrote:
If you have equipment, you fill it out.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message - From: "Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "
19 matches
Mail list logo