It has to do with CPU load.
Since the FDD is running two radios, its doing twice as much work as the
one running a single radio. I have observed the FDD links doing
50-55meg in one direction, and my guess is that the most common loaded
FDD links will be doing 40-50 in one direction and 10-15 i
Matt,
A quick question on your examples...
on the 10 mile link you are getting 45Mbps with 20Mhz, but on the
full-duplex link going the same distance, you are only getting 30Mbps.
Why is there a 50% loss when doing full-duplex?
Also, are you testing with TCP or UDP?
Travis
Microserv
Matt L
http://www.rcrnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080208/FREE/
498388084/1018/FREE
Bob Moldashel
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org
20 MHz or 40 MHz?
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "Dennis Burgess - LinkTechs.net" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 9:08 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] MT vs StarOS
> We
The 35 meg 18 mile link as I said, was with good hardware, the processor is
not the limitation.This was 35meg, real usage thoughput.
Dennis M. Burgess
Mikrotik Certified Consultant
Link Technologies, Inc., St. Louis, Missouri
--WISP/Network Support Services--
+1 314-686-1302
-Original Mes
I'll second that by adding, not only have consistent testing tools for
testing each product, but also taking the time to test the testing tools as
well.
It can make a BIG difference which PC a testing tool is running from.
Taking for granted that one P4 router will perform the same as another P
I'm not trying to make things more complicated, but the tool used to
test is also very important. For example, if you use a BW test tool
that pumps compressible data into a wireless link that has compression
turned on, then you might get misleading results.
IMO, if you are showing your best resul
I meant better than previous MT drivers, not Star-OS wireless drivers.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message -
From: "George Rogato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 8:45 AM
Subject:
Mike Hammett wrote:
> I believe MT v3 has a new wireless driver that is better.
>
Hmmm,
A statement like that must mean that you have quite abit real world
experience to back this up.
Do you have lots of MT and Star units in the wild for considerable
legnths of time?
When giving advice, you
I agree completely on Redback...they are excellent, but expensive.
We've seen Ciscos fall down completely in these applications though.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Eric Muehleisen
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2008 8:41 PM
To: W
Since we were mentioned... :-)
Depending on the router, and the amount of RAM (critical for this
application), we can run between 2000-3000 users with PPPoE/PPPoA and L2TP
on ImageStream gear.
Regards,
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behal
The RB333 and RB600 have comparable MHz, but are significantly faster than
the RB532. As the Intel vs. AMD wars have shown us, MHz is a worthless unit
of comparison among processor lines.
--
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
- Original Message ---
12 matches
Mail list logo
