This is disappointing. IF you read the Mission Statement and Goals of WISPA,
you would understand that this forum is not the place to vent or air ill
feelings. We are supposed to be a community of peers that can look to each
other for support and encouragement as we pursue of business goals.
For those of you that host email for a number of domains, what do you
do for spam filtering?
Right now we have a cluster of Barracuda SF-600s that are up for
renewal in the next couple of months and they are raising their
update/subscription prices.
Between the price increase and other issues I'm
Our hosted-services guys went through a pretty extensive research/vetting
period when our cudas came up for renewal. We went with Red Condor. I hear
nothing but good things from customers and frontline support.
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org
Glad to hear it. I've been talking with their rep and so far it looks good.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Ryan Goldberg rgoldb...@compudyne.net wrote:
Our hosted-services guys went through a pretty extensive research/vetting
period when our cudas came up for renewal. We went with Red
I use postini. Granted I charge for spam filtering to my customers (if
they want it). But at approximately 0.50/inbox/month it is more than
economical. I ran spam assassin, spamd and dspam on a mail server and
while it worked, the maintenance was a headache.
Quite honestly if given the
The following information is offered for your personal use only. It contains no
added starch, sugar or editorial content. It was not processed on any machinery
that also processes eggs or nuts.
Why do they not just make everyone apply for v6 space. At least that
way was designed for tacking IP space to people.
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jack Unger jun...@ask-wi.com wrote:
The following information is offered for your personal use only. It contains
no
added starch, sugar or
Same thing here from CNET:
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20029393-281.html#ixzz1C6HMbtXG
http://news.cnet.com/8301-31921_3-20029393-281.html
Except they are saying it has to be saved for two years! All browsing data
and email.
Nice if you're a big ILEC and have endless funds .
The more I
I will be exercising my right to civil disobedience in the event that
something like this comes to pass. This would never make it through
the court/judiciary system, so I'm fairly certain it won't be a problem.
Matt Larsen
vistabeam.com
On 1/25/2011 7:22 PM, St. Louis Broadband wrote:
Careful Matt, someone might confuse you and me, if you keep up this attitude
Just a friendly warning
++
Neofast, Inc, Making internet easy
541-969-8200 509-386-4589
++
From: Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 8:50 PM
I have never tracked or stored any client identifiable data without
receiving a court order first.
I have NO historical data.
I do not monitor where or what my clients do. I am not a voyeur.
The only thing we keep track of is total data transferred
Cisco 1200 series are FCC certified for DFS bands.
We have a pair of 1250's doing a .3 mile link at 135 Megabits/sec.
Throughput at about 9.5 Megabytes per second on a file copy. Yes, they
are more expensive at about $650 each (CDW), but they work. If you don't
need 802.11n, then the 1242's
LOL, they installed your Rocket mount in the wrong place!
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Scott Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.comwrote:
Whats wrong?
No, its not an optical illusion lol
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102
That's entertaining. I wonder how many this happened to...
-Kevin
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Scott Carullo
sc...@brevardwireless.comwrote:
Whats wrong?
No, its not an optical illusion lol
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102
mounting Ring needs to be rotated 120 deg
On 1/26/2011 1:51 AM, Scott Carullo wrote:
Whats wrong?
No, its not an optical illusion lol
Scott Carullo
Technical Operations
855-FLSPEED x102
WISPA Wants You! Join
15 matches
Mail list logo