Re: [WISPA] Looking for a operator in South Dakota who can point us to Tier 1 PoPs near Aberdeen

2018-01-16 Thread Mitch
*Matthew W. Shultz *| Account Executive - Wholesale D: 612-314-2212 | matthew.shu...@consolidated.com __ consolidated.com | NASDAQ: CNSL On 1/16/2018 8:03 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: "Tier 1" is not a useful term anymore.

Re: [WISPA] Long range adjustments XM/XW client XC AP

2017-10-13 Thread Mitch
On the Gen2s I cant find the no ACK for PtP and on the prism the only way we have gotten link over 14.3 was set to auto... Not the best but works for now till UBNT fixes it Mitch On 10/13/2017 6:17 PM, Rick Boucher wrote: > We are in PTMP. Where would I adjust the No-Ack in there with 8.

Re: [WISPA] Sturgis SD service

2017-07-11 Thread Mitch
Ralph We are not too far from Sturgis Let me know what I can do or contact Mitch Koep 218-851-8689 cell On 7/11/2017 8:41 AM, ralph wrote: We do marinas and campgrounds in the Southeast and had a customer staying at one of them inquire about us doing their campground in Sturgis. 180

Re: [WISPA] Exalt Radio repairs

2017-06-26 Thread Mitch
We send our Exalt back to Exalt for repairs Mitch On 6/26/2017 9:40 AM, Marco Coelho wrote: Do any list members have recommendations for licensed radio repairs for Exalt rc111000 11GHz radios? Just had one killed by a strike Friday. What are the odds I'm driving by the tower at Midnight

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

2017-06-08 Thread Mitch
I here protect existing...What about new PtP priority over PtMP?? On 6/7/2017 4:34 PM, Mark Radabaugh wrote: > For 6Ghz it would likely be a coordinated system similar to the SAS system > planned for CBRS but without the ESC portion. The coordination from the SAS > would protect existing

Re: [WISPA] Looking for opinions on a proposal for PTMP in 6Ghz Part 101 spectrum

2017-06-04 Thread Mitch
+1000 Us too On 6/4/2017 7:45 PM, garrettshan...@vabb.com wrote: I think the 6Ghz band need to stay for PtP links only. As for band sharing I think that the need for reliable wireless back-haul far outweighs any benefit of moving the band completely to part 15. Use of this band for

Re: [WISPA] New NEC rule it may hurt WISPs

2017-05-12 Thread Mitch
I read it Mitch On 05/12/2017 11:16 AM, garrettshan...@vabb.com wrote: Considering V.A. doesn't have a separate certification for low voltage, I certainly hope we're excluded. It would be difficult to get all of our technicians though a 3 year apprenticeship as required by law for a full

[WISPA] New NEC rule it may hurt WISPs

2017-05-12 Thread Mitch
. -- Mitch Koep A Better Wireless 218-851-8689 cell ___ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Re: [WISPA] nanobeam m2 shutting down

2016-10-26 Thread Mitch
Jan Give em a call and I will try to help trouble shoot Mitch Koep 218-851-8689 cell On 10/26/2016 03:26 PM, OOLLC-Support wrote: > am having an issue with a few nanobeam m2 (little moon shaped things). > As looked at on the main tab the TX/RX goes to 1/130 Mbs and sticks > there,