Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Tom DeReggi
has moved. Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Jeromie Reeves" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:14 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Brian Webster
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed I notice that the FCC issued a $10,000 fine to Ayustar in San Juan about a year ago. I hope they got the message. It just might be that the FCC and NTIA were a little fast in making 5600-5650 part of the Part 15

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Brian Webster
One suggestion to get the word out about this problem would be to get press releases and journalists from the IT magazine industries involved. IT types who just throw up a link or two probably don't even know how to spell WISPA or TDWR. Thank You, Brian Webster www.wirelessmapping.com www.Broadb

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Patrick Shoemaker
I like this idea. Combine it with a requirement for manufacturers to disable access to the TDWR frequencies until an unlocking code is entered. The unlocking code will be generated once a license is issued for the link as part of the licensing process. I'm assuming that the main problem here is

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Fred Goldstein
I notice that the FCC issued a $10,000 fine to Ayustar in San Juan about a year ago. I hope they got the message. It just might be that the FCC and NTIA were a little fast in making 5600-5650 part of the Part 15 bands. Sure, licensed equipment can be used without a license (vis. 3650) but tha

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Jack Unger
On 2/9/2011 9:49 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote: > The proper fix for this problem is a visit from the enforcement guys, and a > nasty fine for repeat offenders. Joint FAA/FCC Enforcement teams have been out for a long time but this is a VERY costly solution and likely not sustainable in this era of

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Kurt Fankhauser
ft Outlook -Original Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:50 PM To: memb...@wispa.org; WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes n

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-09 Thread Marlon K. Schafer
The proper fix for this problem is a visit from the enforcement guys, and a nasty fine for repeat offenders. After that, what would be so hard about using sensing and DFS (done right this time) to cause systems near the radars to notch out the 110mhz of spectrum while not bothering anyone else?

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Jeromie Reeves
uot;WISPA General List" > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:10 AM > Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes > needed > > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Blair Davis wrote: >> Inline reply's >> >> On 2/8/2011 11:31

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Tom DeReggi
not support and enable "choice"? Tom DeReggi RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband - Original Message - From: "Jeromie Reeves" To: "WISPA General List" Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:10 AM Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Jeromie Reeves
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Blair Davis wrote: > Inline reply's > > On 2/8/2011 11:31 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote: > > Comments inline. >

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Blair Davis
Inline reply's On 2/8/2011 11:31 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote: On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote: Comments inline. jack On

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Jeromie Reeves
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote: >> Comments inline. >> >> jack >> >> >> On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote: >>> >>> Some serious enforcement is in order.  Major fines for repe

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Jack Unger
Charles, My new comments are preceded by . jack On 2/8/2011 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote: >> Comments inline. >> >> jack >> >> >> On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote: >>> Some serious enforcemen

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Charles N Wyble
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote: > Comments inline. > > jack > > > On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote: >> >> Some serious enforcement is in order. Major fines for repeated >> offense... $100K or more for 2nd offense... > Last month we

Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes needed

2011-02-08 Thread Jack Unger
Comments inline. jack On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote: > Copied to both lists to stimulate comments on this... > > done. > > Some serious enforcement is in order. Major fines for repeated > offense... $100K or more for 2nd offense... Last month we recommended to the FCC OET that they pu