has moved.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Jeromie Reeves"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 1:14 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes
needed
I notice that the FCC issued a $10,000 fine to Ayustar in San Juan
about a year ago. I hope they got the message.
It just might be that the FCC and NTIA were a little fast in making
5600-5650 part of the Part 15
One suggestion to get the word out about this problem would be to get press
releases and journalists from the IT magazine industries involved. IT types
who just throw up a link or two probably don't even know how to spell WISPA
or TDWR.
Thank You,
Brian Webster
www.wirelessmapping.com
www.Broadb
I like this idea. Combine it with a requirement for manufacturers to
disable access to the TDWR frequencies until an unlocking code is
entered. The unlocking code will be generated once a license is issued
for the link as part of the licensing process.
I'm assuming that the main problem here is
I notice that the FCC issued a $10,000 fine to Ayustar in San Juan
about a year ago. I hope they got the message.
It just might be that the FCC and NTIA were a little fast in making
5600-5650 part of the Part 15 bands. Sure, licensed equipment can be
used without a license (vis. 3650) but tha
On 2/9/2011 9:49 AM, Marlon K. Schafer wrote:
> The proper fix for this problem is a visit from the enforcement guys, and a
> nasty fine for repeat offenders.
Joint FAA/FCC Enforcement teams have been out for a long time but this is
a VERY costly solution and likely not sustainable in this era of
ft Outlook
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Marlon K. Schafer
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:50 PM
To: memb...@wispa.org; WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes
n
The proper fix for this problem is a visit from the enforcement guys, and a
nasty fine for repeat offenders.
After that, what would be so hard about using sensing and DFS (done right
this time) to cause systems near the radars to notch out the 110mhz of
spectrum while not bothering anyone else?
uot;WISPA General List"
> Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA Members] Your input on 5 GHz rules changes
> needed
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
>> Inline reply's
>>
>> On 2/8/2011 11:31
not support and
enable "choice"?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Jeromie Reeves"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 12:10 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] [WISPA
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
> Inline reply's
>
> On 2/8/2011 11:31 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble
> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
>
> Comments inline.
>
Inline reply's
On 2/8/2011 11:31 PM, Jeromie Reeves wrote:
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
Comments inline.
jack
On
On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
>> Comments inline.
>>
>> jack
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
>>>
>>> Some serious enforcement is in order. Major fines for repe
Charles,
My new comments are preceded by .
jack
On 2/8/2011 7:14 PM, Charles N Wyble wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
>> Comments inline.
>>
>> jack
>>
>>
>> On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
>>> Some serious enforcemen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2011 02:23 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
> Comments inline.
>
> jack
>
>
> On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
>>
>> Some serious enforcement is in order. Major fines for repeated
>> offense... $100K or more for 2nd offense...
> Last month we
Comments inline.
jack
On 2/8/2011 2:09 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
> Copied to both lists to stimulate comments on this...
>
> done.
>
> Some serious enforcement is in order. Major fines for repeated
> offense... $100K or more for 2nd offense...
Last month we recommended to the FCC OET that they pu
16 matches
Mail list logo