Oops not offlist good thing it wasn't a secret ;)
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
From: "Jeremie Chism"
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:18 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65g
so what wimax gear are you using?
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
From: "Jeremie Chism"
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 10:18 AM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
A
> ----- Original Message -
>> From: "Chuck Bartosch"
>> To: "WISPA General List"
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
>>
>>
>>> We did not find that WiMax
ate the advantage.
Chuck
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck Bartosch"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:05 AM
&
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Bartosch"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2010 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
> We did not find that WiMa
We did not find that WiMax in general was better than 900. The key isn't WiMax,
per se, but diversity antennas. Performance is *helped* by being 3.65 WiMax but
that alone does NOT obviate the need for 900 in our experience. Diversity is
key.
Chuck
On Apr 19, 2010, at 9:23 AM, Jeremie Chism wro
I have no experience with 802.16e, but have lots with 802.16d.
16d does not support MIMO. However, even without MIMO, we are "ripping out
900/5.x" and putting in Alvarion .16d. The diversity alone gives it penetration
characteristics equal to or better than 900. WiMax does cost more, as we all
...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
>> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:24 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
>>
>> I am not using alvarion 3.65 but I am u
l Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-
>> boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
>> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:24 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
>>
>
44820
> 419-562-6405
> www.wavelinc.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
> Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:24 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz
2010 8:55 AM
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
> I too have heard from others that WIMAX was designed so that the customers
> with poor connections don't take performance away from the rest with good
> connection
c.com
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Jeremie Chism
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2010 9:24 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Alvarion 3.65ghz NLOS as good as 900mhz?
I am not using alvarion 3.65 but I am using
I am not using alvarion 3.65 but I am using wimax. I have a couple
customers with lower modulation because of non line of site situations
and have seen no impact on the entire system in general. "Supposedly"
wimax is engineered to handle some of this better than my alvarion 900.
Sent from my
That would only be true if the data services are somewhat
purpose-specific and not Internet access. Doing what this vendor told
you would seriously affect aggregate performance of the cell because
of low rate modulation of the NLOS and/or distant customers.
If you are doing sensor networks or POS
Has anyone seen the Alvarion 3.65ghz 802.16e equipment in operation? Was
talking to one vendor that claimed if you run the system in MIMO that with
the diversity you can do NLOS as good as 900mhz and if you get the AP on a
300ft tower that it starts to "feel" like 700mhz. He claimed the NLOS was so
15 matches
Mail list logo