I can't comment on PMP450/m because our density doesn't justify the
cost; but I can say that I've been extremely happy with ePMP.
They did have a firmware problem with 3.2, but it's fixed in 3.3 (at
least in the RC I tested for them). They've always been very responsive
to firmware feedback
w.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
>> From: "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
>> <mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>>
>> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org <mai
ral List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:45:14 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison
>
> But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552
ess@wispa.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2017 11:45:14 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Cambium 450, 450m, and epmp in 5.X GHz Comparison
But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
it's a non issue.
the 450m is designed in every way for high density, high capacity
deployment.
-sean
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 10:44 AM, Marco Coelho wrote:
> I understand that, but sm on the rear of a panel can interfere with it if
> there is freq overlap.
>
> On Tue, Mar
On 3/21/17 09:44, Marco Coelho wrote:
> I understand that, but sm on the rear of a panel can interfere with it
> if there is freq overlap.
Set the SM Receive Target Level to whatever is appropriate.
~Seth
___
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
F/B ratio is critical when doing ABAB channel reuse even with sync. I
imagine the 450m spec sheet states the F/B.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote:
>> Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind
But they'll listen at the same time, too, from CPEs on the other AP.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 12:38 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote:
> > Those
I understand that, but sm on the rear of a panel can interfere with it if
there is freq overlap.
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:38 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote:
> > Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to
> > increase
On 3/21/17 09:31, Marco Coelho wrote:
> Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to
> increase the F/B ratio instead of physical separation?
>
The sectors hearing each other isn't really an issue with GPS sync since
they will all TX at the same time.
~Seth
Those using the 450m, are you having to put anything behind the to increase
the F/B ratio instead of physical separation?
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:13 AM, Josh Luthman
wrote:
> 450m if revenue supports it.
>
> Epmp if not.
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
450m if revenue supports it.
Epmp if not.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 21, 2017 12:12 PM, "Marco Coelho" wrote:
> Anyone want to offer a comparison of the different equipment listed.
> Cost, real
Anyone want to offer a comparison of the different equipment listed.
Cost, real throughput, Reliability, Customer Satisfaction,
--
Marco C. Coelho
Argon Technologies Inc.
POB 875
Greenville, TX 75403-0875
903-455-5036
___
Wireless mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo