Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-06 Thread Matt Liotta
On Feb 6, 2010, at 12:07 PM, Jeff Broadwick wrote: > I am afraid you will have to be disapointed. I know that American > Thinker has a point of view...but what SPECIFICALLY did they get wrong? > It doesn't matter what was right or wrong in the article you cited because even if everything was

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-06 Thread Jeff Broadwick
-Original Message----- >> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless- >> boun...@wispa.org] On >> Behalf Of Matt Liotta >> Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:53 PM >> To: WISPA Genera

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Matt Liotta
rg] On > Behalf Of Matt Liotta > Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:53 PM > To: WISPA General List > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: > TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality > > I won't attempt to prove a negative. It was you who made the claim CRA > ca

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Brad Belton
neral List' Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality Here is a nice timeline for anyone that wants to read it. I'm done with this on-list: http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/what_really_happened_in_the_mo.html Regards, J

Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality

2010-02-05 Thread Jeff Broadwick
al Message- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Matt Liotta Sent: Friday, February 05, 2010 3:53 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Common Carrier or what: TheFCC'sroleinregulationofnet-neutrality I won't attempt to prove a nega