Message---
From: Rick Harnish
Date: 11/29/2012 2:53:28 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
Are you on the Louisiana Broadband Map?
http://www.bakerbb.com/labroadbandmapping/
My contact in Louisiana is:
Mr. Craig Johnson
Louisiana
and may help.
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
On Behalf Of Doug Clark
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:01 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
Correct me if I am wrong here Rick, it will be fruitless
Excellent point.
---Original Message---
From: Fred Goldstein
Date: 11/30/2012 9:10:00 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
At 11/30/2012 10:17 AM, Rick Harnish wrote:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary
[ mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Doug Clark
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 10:01 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
Correct me if I am wrong here Rick, it will be fruitless to do the map
unless you are able to maintain
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is
excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even
Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100?
I assumed he meant that Canopy 900mHz can not provide speeds above that.
---Original Message---
From: Matt
Date: 11/30/2012 9:46:04 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
approach is used, you could comment that raising
At 11/30/2012 11:45 AM, Matt wrote:
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is
excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even
Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to 4/1 is
excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more appropriate. Even
Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not loaded), though YMMV.
Are you saying no one is providing service past 1.5/384 with Canopy 100?
Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
At 11/30/2012 11:45 AM, Matt wrote:
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to
4/1 is excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more
appropriate. Even Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not
loaded), though
: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
At 11/30/2012 11:45 AM, Matt wrote:
approach is used, you could comment that raising it from 768/200 to
4/1 is excessive, and perhaps say a 1.5/384 standard is more
appropriate. Even Canopy 100 can probably claim that (if it's not
loaded
At 11/30/2012 03:26 PM, Brian Webster wrote:
The rule as it stands now is 3 meg down and 768 up. The 4 meg down and 1 meg
up was something put in the National Broadband Plan by the white house team.
Problem with that is the National Broadband Map (of which was already spec'd
out when they wrote
, 2012 5:17 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
The FCC's home page ( transition.fcc.gov ) has an item about Connect
America
Fund, posted with no description. This turns out to be a further NPRM
about
Phase I funding.
As you may recall
List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
Rick, I thought that we did this task, but please tell me how I can
confirm. - Cliff
On 11/28/12 4:45 PM, Rick Harnish rharn...@wispa.org wrote:
Fred,
I assure you the WISPA FCC Committee is indeed
The FCC's home page ( transition.fcc.gov ) has an item about Connect
America Fund, posted with no description. This turns out to be a
further NPRM about Phase I funding.
As you may recall, CAF Phase I was the short-term (2012) step that
offered $775 per line to price-cap ILECs (the Bells and
)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 5:17 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
The FCC's home page ( transition.fcc.gov
...@wispa.org (Trina and Rick)
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 5:17 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc
For a one time payment of $775 per home, I can connect ALL the
unconnected homes in my county...
But that is not how it works, is it?
I'll be buried in red tape and paper for the rest of my life,
right? And, of course, since I took their money, they can now
At 11/28/2012 05:56 PM, Blair Davis wrote:
For a one time payment of $775 per home, I can connect ALL the
unconnected homes in my county...
But that is not how it works, is it?
Alas, Phase I is for incumbents only.
Phase II, when it happens next year, will allow others to bid. This
will
General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] FCC Connect America Fund -- It's Bc!
Fred,
I assure you the WISPA FCC Committee is indeed on this. You make great
points and we appreciate your review. You are definitely correct, that WISPs
NEED to get on the National Broadband Map NOW! Those
19 matches
Mail list logo
