Re: [WISPA] From ATT public policy blog- Comcast vs Level3

2010-12-22 Thread Tom DeReggi
public policy blog- Comcast vs Level3 I guess what I don't understand about this whole thing is how much traffic one ISP is sending another. So, if you send me too much traffic, you must pay. I think nearly every WISP on this list is receiving more traffic than we are sending AND we are paying

[WISPA] From ATT public policy blog- Comcast vs Level3

2010-12-21 Thread Tom DeReggi
A bit after the fact, but thought I'd pass this article on that clearly quotes the Hippocracy and Spin from Level3.. http://attpublicpolicy.com/ It's Not Really Louder Just Because it Goes to Eleven. Posted by: Bob Quinn on December 2, 2010 at 11:40 am When I read earlier this week that Level

Re: [WISPA] From ATT public policy blog- Comcast vs Level3

2010-12-21 Thread can...@believewireless.net
I guess what I don't understand about this whole thing is how much traffic one ISP is sending another. So, if you send me too much traffic, you must pay. I think nearly every WISP on this list is receiving more traffic than we are sending AND we are paying for it. Why are they not paying us?

Re: [WISPA] From ATT public policy blog- Comcast vs Level3

2010-12-21 Thread Fred Goldstein
At 12/21/2010 09:51 AM, canopy wrote: I guess what I don't understand about this whole thing is how much traffic one ISP is sending another. So, if you send me too much traffic, you must pay. I think nearly every WISP on this list is receiving more traffic than we are sending AND we are paying

Re: [WISPA] From ATT public policy blog- Comcast vs Level3

2010-12-21 Thread John Scrivner
Start regulating it and all hell (that is, the place where all the lawyers are) breaks loose.  --  Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein at ionary.com  ionary Consulting              http://www.ionary.com/  +1 617 795 2701 And when the free market peering / upstream solutions are replaced