inal Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Leon D. Zetekoff
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 4:53 PM
To: wireless@wispa.org
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
On 04/26/2010 03:03 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
> Correct. Ham radio can not be used for
ho are licensed hams, that certainly suggests a unique
way
>>> to get rid of your competitors who aren't :-)
>>>
>>> Tom S.
>>> WA6HAS
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Leon D. Zetekoff"
>>> To:
>>>
went out of business.
>
> You can still probably find some stuff about it by Googling. The Company
was
> Darwin Networks and the place was Houston TX.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Be
hams, that certainly suggests a unique way
>>> to get rid of your competitors who aren't :-)
>>>
>>> Tom S.
>>> WA6HAS
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "Leon D. Zetekoff"
>>> To:
>>> Sent
iginal Message -
From: "Leon D. Zetekoff"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
On 4/26/2010 10:06 AM, Philip Dorr wrote:
HAMs have a secondary license (Lower than Licensed, but higher than
unlicensed). HAMs can use 2390MHz-2450MHz and put out
round".
>
> jack K6XS
>
> Tom Sharples wrote:
>
> For those WISPs who are licensed hams, that certainly suggests a unique way
> to get rid of your competitors who aren't :-)
>
> Tom S.
> WA6HAS
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Leon D. Zetekoff
Tom S.
WA6HAS
- Original Message -
From: "Leon D. Zetekoff"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
On 4/26/2010 10:06 AM, Philip Dorr wrote:
HAMs have a secondary license (Lower than Licensed, but higher than
unlicens
For those WISPs who are licensed hams, that certainly suggests a unique way
to get rid of your competitors who aren't :-)
Tom S.
WA6HAS
- Original Message -
From: "Leon D. Zetekoff"
To:
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 8:03 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
> On
On 4/26/2010 10:06 AM, Philip Dorr wrote:
HAMs have a secondary license (Lower than Licensed, but higher than
unlicensed). HAMs can use 2390MHz-2450MHz and put out a max EIRP of
1.5kW, but in that RF range (2.4GHz) that is called a "microwave
oven". HAMs can also use 5650MHz-5925MHz.
http://www
The Company was
>> Darwin Networks and the place was Houston TX.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>> Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
>> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 PM
>
wavelinc.com
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of ralphlists
> Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:27 AM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
>
> Not exactly c
find some stuff about it by Googling. The Company was
> Darwin Networks and the place was Houston TX.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 PM
> T
On 4/26/2010 9:29 AM, Leon D. Zetekoff wrote:
On 4/27/2010 9:11 AM, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
Correct my if I'm wrong but don't HAMS have use of the lower portion
of the
2.4ghz band???
And if so they are not subject to the EIRP limits and equipment
certification that we are, so in theory a HAM co
al Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ralphlists
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:27 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
Not exactly correct.
You do not want to run under the ISP service! It does not allow dat
lists
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:27 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
Not exactly correct.
You do not want to run under the ISP service! It does not allow data.
It is for devices that do things with RF energy- not ones that "communicate"
Th
e not ISM users!
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of ralphlists
Sent: Monday, April 26, 2010 2:27 AM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
Not exactly correct.
You do not want to run under the
rks and the place was Houston TX.
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
>> On
>> Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
>> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 PM
>> To: WISPA General List
&
tworks and the place was Houston TX.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org]
> On
> Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs U
ng. The Company was
Darwin Networks and the place was Houston TX.
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Patrick Shoemaker
Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:38 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] ISM vs UNII
Two di
Two different sets of regulations. ISM has more permitted uses and
generally looser rules. UNII has more restrictions but more spectrum is
available than just ISM.
Patrick Shoemaker
Vector Data Systems LLC
shoemak...@vectordatasystems.com
office: (301) 358-1690 x36
http://www.vectordatasystems.c
Whats the diff?
Gino A. Villarini
g...@aeronetpr.com
Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp.
787.273.4143
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
21 matches
Mail list logo
