sector power?
Not only that but the systems tend to work much nicer when they are run
within the design specs
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Robert West"
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum se
Not only that but the systems tend to work much nicer when they are run
within the design specs
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Robert West"
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 9:12 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector p
At 6/26/2010 12:55 AM, Jack Unger wrote:
>Fred Goldstein wrote:
>>
>>At 6/25/2010 03:31 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
>>>I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
>>>transmitters.
>>>
>>In general, yes. But they have claimed authority over receivers
>>too. Remember that even
Fred Goldstein wrote:
At 6/25/2010 03:31 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
In general, yes. But they have claimed authority over receivers
too. Remember that even receive-only satellite Earth s
agree with that?
Bob-
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
At 6/24/2010 12:12 AM, Robert West wrote:
>St
: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
At 6/24/2010 09:32 AM, Bob West wrote:
>Man, that's ugly. I've never tested the spread of the older nanos, the
>new M series look as if they stay where you put them though. But
>that's a mess...
Sure is. I smell hardware.
"
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Fred Goldstein
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:29 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
At 6/24/2010 12:12 AM, Robert West wrote:
>Stick wit
ge -
> From: Blair Davis
> To: WISPA General List
> Sent: Friday, June 25, 2010 3:31 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
>
> I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
> transmitters.
>
> CPE to AP is PtP. AP to
e: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
CPE to AP is PtP. AP to CPE is PtMP.
This was prior to "smart AP's" and the AP 120 deg or less beamwidth rule.
RickG wrote:
Does the FCC take its cues
At 6/25/2010 03:31 AM, Blair Davis wrote:
>I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
>transmitters.
In general, yes. But they have claimed authority over receivers
too. Remember that even receive-only satellite Earth stations
required licenses in the days before DBS
I thought this one was settled a long time ago... The FCC regulates
transmitters.
CPE to AP is PtP. AP to CPE is PtMP.
This was prior to "smart AP's" and the AP 120 deg or less beamwidth
rule.
RickG wrote:
Does the FCC take its cues from the IRS? :)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:43 AM,
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 19:53:34 -0400
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
Not to argue your point as I agree with you but how do you know your
running it at 100%? Just cause it says so doesnt mean it is. ("It"
being the radio).
-Ric
on
> http://www.mtin.net/blog
> Wisp Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
>
>
>
> From: Ryan Ghering
> Reply-To: WISPA General List
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:53:23 -0600
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
> We
Does the FCC take its cues from the IRS? :)
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Rubens Kuhl wrote:
>>
>> The PtP/PtMP distinction does create interesting ambiguity. But then
>
> My favorite ambiguity is whether the PtP/PtMP distinction applies to
> the full-duplex system or per traffic direction..
eply-To: WISPA General List
> Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:53:23 -0600
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
> We are running RocketM2's and RocketM5's and we have set policy's on the 120
> sectors
> to limit the power on the r
23 Jun 2010 22:53:23 -0600
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
> We are running RocketM2's and RocketM5's and we have set policy's on the 120
> sectors
> to limit the power on the radios to 17db they seem to act better then
> setti
.
Justin
--
Justin Wilson
http://www.mtin.net/blog
Wisp Consulting Tower Climbing Network Support
From: Ryan Ghering
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 22:53:23 -0600
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
We are running RocketM2'
eless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
>Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:56 AM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
>Do not forget OOB and the likes. I have been using AirView for a while
>to ch
] Maximum sector power?
Or you can be legit in Canada, and go for 3.65 GHz and get up to 57 dBM
legally in rural areas ;)
Courtesy of the guy that changed the rules for 3.65 in Canada and is looking
for the US to do the same...
F.
On 2010-06-23, at 5:41 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
> I'm just
Jeromie Reeves
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2010 12:56 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
Do not forget OOB and the likes. I have been using AirView for a while
to check on my sites and some were unacceptable to me (5mhz but still
hitting 10 or 20mhz at -85) so I rep
We had a discussion about this on the ubnt board. I have a pair of nanobridge M
units. No difference was shown with an increase or decrease in power. I did
notice at a certain point that after a day the units would completely stop
transmitting. A reboot would fix it.
Sent from my iPhone
On Ju
FYI.
Please make sure that you are running the most recent version 5.2 on the M
series... Older firmware had known issues in setting up the output power.
Faisal
On Jun 24, 2010, at 10:06 AM, "Stuart Pierce" wrote:
> I see negligible difference in signal strength anyway between 20 and 27.
>
ent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 4:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
I'm just a little confused about some of these nice-looking access
points. The UBNT Rocket M5, for instance, can put out +27 dBm. It
plugs *right into* a nice 19dB sector antenna. Okay,
I see negligible difference in signal strength anyway between 20 and 27.
-- Original Message --
From: Francois Menard
Reply-To: WISPA General List
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 09:03:59 -0400
>Or you can be legit in Canada, and go for 3.65 GHz and get up to 57
Or you can be legit in Canada, and go for 3.65 GHz and get up to 57 dBM legally
in rural areas ;)
Courtesy of the guy that changed the rules for 3.65 in Canada and is looking
for the US to do the same...
F.
On 2010-06-23, at 5:41 PM, Fred R. Goldstein wrote:
> I'm just a little confused about
How about the age old, if your AP talks to one client at a time, then it is a
ptp system. Much more so now with scheduling and UBNT's AirMax. I'm still on
the talk about a 120* or less allows you to increase beyond 36 on each end. The
talk was coming from the FCC a few years back from people li
..@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Fred R. Goldstein
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:41 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
> I'm just a little confused about some of these nice-looking access points.
> The UBNT Rocket M5, for instance, can p
We are running RocketM2's and RocketM5's and we have set policy's on the 120
sectors
to limit the power on the radios to 17db they seem to act better then
setting them to 20.
Oddly enough much stronger signal's at 17 than at 20..
We have one site where we have the radios set to 13 and they work
be
>
> The PtP/PtMP distinction does create interesting ambiguity. But then
My favorite ambiguity is whether the PtP/PtMP distinction applies to
the full-duplex system or per traffic direction... one reading would
say that an uplink(Customer - > WISP) that is made using directive
antennas can follow
ireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
>Behalf Of Fred R. Goldstein
>Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:41 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
>
>I'm just a little confused about some of these nice-looking access points.
10 5:41 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Maximum sector power?
I'm just a little confused about some of these nice-looking access points.
The UBNT Rocket M5, for instance, can put out +27 dBm. It plugs *right
into* a nice 19dB sector antenna. Okay, the smaller,
120 dB sector is o
And when the FCC comes knocking, you can always point to the other guy
and say "but he's worse!"
Or not...
Randy
On 6/23/2010 3:59 PM, Jack Unger wrote:
> That's a basic question.
>
> From one consultant to another... the maximum legal access point EIRP
> on 5.8 GHz is +36 dBm.
>
> What ind
That's a basic question.
From one consultant to another... the maximum legal access point EIRP
on 5.8 GHz is +36 dBm.
What individual WISP operators actually do in practice is anybody's guess.
The majority of WISP operators are mature, responsible people. They
strive to do the right thing and
That's a basic question.
From one consultant to another... the maximum legal access point EIRP
on 5.8 GHz is +36 dBm.
What individual WISP operators actually do in practice is anybody's guess.
The majority of WISP operators are mature, responsible people. They
strive to do the right thing and
I'm just a little confused about some of these nice-looking access
points. The UBNT Rocket M5, for instance, can put out +27 dBm. It
plugs *right into* a nice 19dB sector antenna. Okay, the smaller,
120 dB sector is only 16 dB. Now math is not really my thing but I
get a total ERP there of
35 matches
Mail list logo
