ginal Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 4:22 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn'
computer.
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 3:22 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
>
> I think
ject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I think I listed all my reasons.
No support from anyone on it
MT doesn't get the channel right (small but on a bad day big)
Poor bang/buck - Ligowave is best here IMO
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley wrote:
> Any reason you're avoi
ginal Message-
> From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
> Behalf Of Josh Luthman
> Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
>
> I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80
I think that should read "table", not "cable".
Josh Luthman wrote:
> I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
> going to do.
>
> I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
> 5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
Any reason you're avoiding MT with 3.65?
-Original Message-
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
On Thu, August 20, 2009 2:51 pm, Jason Hensley wrote:
> I know it works, but will the FCC come crashing down on me if they find
> out
> I have these in place?
As long as you're licensed (just a couple hundred bucks), and every 3650
endpoint is
mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2009 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find
On Thu, August 20, 2009 2:51 pm, Jason Hensley wrote:
> I know it works, but will the FCC come crashing down on me if they find
> out
> I have these in place?
As long as you're licensed (just a couple hundred bucks), and every 3650
endpoint is registered with the FCC (you have to register not just
: [WISPA] Mikrotik and 3650
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8
I personally am avoiding 3.65 and MT. Ligowave and an80 are what I am
going to do.
I do know it works, though. You have to find the cable that matches
5.8 frequency in MT to 3.65 in actual output. No support by MT (or
even as much as an answer to my questions).
On 8/20/09, Jason Hensley wrote
I need a backhaul link outside of 2.4 and 5.8. If I put together a Mikrotik
system, say an RB600 with an Xr3 and put a 20db Grid on each end would that
be legal? Admittedly I'm not up to speed on what is and is not allowed in
3650 as far as power output, etc etc. This would be a short backhaul -
12 matches
Mail list logo
