l.com
--
From: "Josh Luthman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:48 PM
To: "WISPA General List"
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
> When I read "However, pings from the client to my office will drop for an
> inte
That and Lonnie is a jerk.
>
>Steve Barnes
>RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
>
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
>Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:57 PM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject:
-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of Steve Barnes
>> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 AM
>> To: WISPA General List
>> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>>
>> I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open channel. Here
> - Original Message -
> From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 AM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>
>
>
>> I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open c
suck
when that hits -80 or even -75.
marlon
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Barnes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 7:23 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the onl
nt: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:23 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>
> I have scanned from the AP 2422 is the only open channel. Here is info
> from the scan.
>
> 2462 -35
> 2447 -76
> 2437 -77
> 2447 -77
> 2462 -80
&g
rest were -86 or more(less).
Steve Barnes
RCWiFi Wireless Internet Service
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Josh Luthman
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:57 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
Note that when
ed changing channels??
>
> Mac
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Steve Barnes
> > Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:30 AM
> > To: WISPA General List
> > Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
> &
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Steve Barnes
> Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:30 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>
> MT AP side -71 11mb/11mb CCQ=96% Sig to noise=29dB. Tranzeo -70 Noise
> -102 11Mb
>
> Stev
List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
Steve,
You may have already stated this, but what is the RSSI reported in the
TRCPQ19? What is the SNR reported at the AP in the MT box? If you are
running a XR2 in the MT AP and have a CPQ19 as a CPE and do not have a
signal level being reported o
7:27 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>
> It is on v 3.15 there is no unusual disassociation. The issue is very
> intermittent and lasts anywhere from 10 seconds to 2 min. These 2
> clients are now to the place that they keep a small ping going t
patient. I am not mangling the packets I any way it is a
straight through Masqueraded Nat.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 6:55 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Matt Larsen - Lists
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 7:57 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
I'm curious to hear why the client's VPN wouldn't work. I haven't had
any problem with clie
November 12, 2008 3:36 PM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>
> You may want to look at the status tab of the associated clients on the
> AP.
> See if there are lost packets or a lot of retransmissions.
>
> Did you really use a RB411 or did you
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Steve Barnes wrote:
>In reply to the RB411. We changed from a StarOS WAR board that
>would not work for our clients VPN and the company that put up my
>towers replaced them with a RB411. I was the Guinea Pig for their
>Mikrotik AP setup. I am a Tranzeo Guy and know littl
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008, Steve Barnes wrote:
> I have a odd issue(as always).
If you are running a RouterOS version <3.15, try upgrading. That
has fixed similar situations. If you are able to watch the tower,
when this happens, look at the log to see if clients are
disconnecting en masse and the
neral List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
Short answer - rb411a is a good pick.
Dennis brought a really good fact to my attention. The rb411a and rb433
have the same CPU memory (though lacks both 2 minipci slots and 2 NICs,
but
this is an AP after all). On the vendors websites I browsed q
Short answer - rb411a is a good pick.
Dennis brought a really good fact to my attention. The rb411a and rb433
have the same CPU memory (though lacks both 2 minipci slots and 2 NICs, but
this is an AP after all). On the vendors websites I browsed quickly the
rb411a is often a good $20 cheaper.
H
I do prefer the 433AHs, however if you are only putting a single radio
card on it, then the 411A vs 433 is wash. Same processor, same RAM as
the 433. If you are not doing much with it, it should work fine. Going
to multiple radios per board, 433AH, is the way to go though.
ameron Kilton
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:48 PM
> To: 'WISPA General List'
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
>
> Yeah, but he said he was plugged directly to the jbox so the router
> issue should be out of the mix.
>
> Can you ping the AP from the CPE wh
WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
Yeah, but he said he was plugged directly to the jbox so the router
issue should be out of the mix.
Can you ping the AP from the CPE when this dropout happens?
How is the CCQ on the effected clients?
Is it possible to turn down the
When I read "However, pings from the client to my office will drop for an
intermittent time period several times an hour." I believe he was referring
from the CPE radio to his office PC/core.
RB411 is meant for a CPE device. RB433 is meant for an AP.
If your customers are happy and paying their
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sam Tetherow
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 3:46 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
What is the client radio? What does the networking look like. My first
guess would be a crappy
General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Mikrotik issues
You may want to look at the status tab of the associated clients on the
AP.
See if there are lost packets or a lot of retransmissions.
Did you really use a RB411 or did you mean another model for the AP?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937
What is the client radio? What does the networking look like. My first
guess would be a crappy customer side router which is either having
issues with an ARP table or connection table filling up.
Sam Tetherow
Sandhills Wireless
Steve Barnes wrote:
> I have a odd issue(as always).
>
> First of
You may want to look at the status tab of the associated clients on the AP.
See if there are lost packets or a lot of retransmissions.
Did you really use a RB411 or did you mean another model for the AP?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 4537
I have a odd issue(as always).
First of all I have a 180 sector with a RB411 XR2 3.15 OS 44 Clients.
Can that board handle that load running B everyone at 2MB? All CPE's
are Tranzeo TR19
Next I have 3 clients off of that sector with the same issue. Pings
from my office to the CPE NEVER drop.
Recently, we decided to run VLANs off of one of the Mikrotik routers to
provide better port density. Basically routed vlans to a Cisco 2950 switch
(one VLAN per AP). To our disappointment, we found that this scenario
yielded packet loss even pinging between a hardwired radio and the Mikrotik.
We
28 matches
Mail list logo