meeting)
www.odessaoffice.com/wireless
www.odessaoffice.com/marlon/cam
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Moldashel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 02, 2005 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re: [Unlicensed_advocates] Of Potential
D]>
To: "Marlon K. Schafer (509) 982-2181" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 11:21 AM
Subject: [WISPA] Re: [Unlicensed_advocates] Of Potential interest
Yes. You should be concerned about landlords cutting exclusive deals with
telcos and cable cos to proh
Yes. You should be concerned about landlords cutting exclusive deals
with telcos and cable cos to prohibit competing wireless
networks. I'm not talking about roof top access; I'm talking about
asserting control over internal networks so that you can't reach
business customers. The OTARD rule
eless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
www.nwwnet.net
-- Original Message
---
From: Bob Moldashel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: WISPA General List
Sent: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 21:52:34 -0400
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Re: [Unlicensed_advocates] Of Potenti
Some thoughts..
I agree that we should support Continental for the following reasons:
The use of the wireless system used by Continental is constructed in
space used exclusively by Continental and/or its agents, clients,
employees and cannot be used by any others. As such it is not conside
Thanks Harold!
Guys, it seems to me that we should jump in bed with Continental on this
issue. This same rule would certainly apply to mesh type systems or aps
which have, thus far, not been covered under OTARD.
Thoughts?
Marlon
(509) 982-2181 Equipment sale
