nc
> (i.e. share frequencies) like other systems do. By giving it the ability to
> do that, you have an inexpensive hardware platform with $1 per AP
> features.
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "WISPA
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
> But the control point would be at the tower, not remote. I know some WISPs
> operate in remote areas, but this is more for a high density urban
> deployment, similar to what you would use AirSpan or Alvarion for.
>
Right. Makes sense. I re read the original post. My a
. By giving it the ability to
do that, you have an inexpensive hardware platform with $1 per AP
features.
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 1:57 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The n
>> Right. Madwifi ( http://madwifi.org/ ) is pretty good but having
>> trouble keeping up with new Atheros models.
>>
>
> MadWiFi is a sort of reverse engineering.Atheros knows how the chipsets
> work and you can buy the documentation, raw code, the secrets of the HAL,
> everything, by
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The nanostation thing
>
> Right. Madwifi ( http://madwifi.
Doug Ratcliffe wrote:
> My thoughts on this I've even mentied on the Mikrotik forum a while ago were
> to have a 2 part system:
>
> An outdoor wireless unit (like a Nanostation) that does nothing but act as a
> raw wireless interface, that connects to a master station inside the tower
> control
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Monday, July 21, 2008 1:17 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] The nanostation thing
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> In short, it was to create a open source platform for WISP use. I
>> called
>> it WISP-OS.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> In short, it was to create a open source platform for WISP use. I called
> it WISP-OS. All the functions of routing, firewalling, dhcp client and
> server, and all the other networking functions are out there and
> consistently being improved in the open source c
A year or two ago I had this idea that's related to our discussions...
In short, it was to create a open source platform for WISP use. I called
it WISP-OS. All the functions of routing, firewalling, dhcp client and
server, and all the other networking functions are out there and
consistentl
