Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
Brian,
Standards don't really matter unless you have interop on the mac layer as
well as QOS.With just MAC and phy layer interoperability, the only thing
that will be supported is simple bridging and routing when you use seperate
vendor's CPE and Base stations. btw, no
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:07 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Trango at ISPCON
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Trango repeated its WISP summit at ISPCON again this year as well.
The purpose was to ask WISPs what they need in next generation products,
and disclose upcomming products.
It was also
So you are saying we won't have a bunch of products to choose from that
work together like with WiFi?
Jeffrey Thomas wrote:
Brian,
Standards don't really matter unless you have interop on the mac layer as
well as QOS.With just MAC and phy layer interoperability, the only thing
that will be su
Brian,
Standards don't really matter unless you have interop on the mac layer as
well as QOS.With just MAC and phy layer interoperability, the only thing
that will be supported is simple bridging and routing when you use seperate
vendor's CPE and Base stations. btw, no one is currently supporting
Tom DeReggi wrote:
Trango repeated its WISP summit at ISPCON again this year as well.
The purpose was to ask WISPs what they need in next generation
products, and disclose upcomming products.
It was also exciting to learn more about their next generation WIMax
product. The advantage of that
Trango repeated its WISP summit at ISPCON again this year as well.
The purpose was to ask WISPs what they need in next generation products, and
disclose upcomming products.
It was also exciting to learn more about their next generation WIMax
product. The advantage of that platform, is its early