ll apply
to WISP's future of using VOIP.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Wu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'"
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 1:49 P
The way I see it is this: (automatic insertion of my .o2 cents)
If Bell South can charge people extra for added services I can too.
You pay extra for call waiting, call forwarding, call blocking...etc - -
- you pay extra on my internet service to have me give your VoIP packets
prioritizati
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
For some reason, I am getting a feeling that thread may be going
beyond "topic debate" to "personal attacks" -- so I will restate my
If you are referring to my comment, you are missing the point. I am
not, in any way, attacking you personally. I am simp
Title: Message
You seem
to be taking this beyond what anyone has stated. There maybe those
that say the things that you claim above, however what yousaid was that
"...preference of one's own traffic...is not that muchdifferent than..." and
you went on to show a link to a story thatwas NOT E
On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Charles Wu wrote:
If you take this line reasoning a few iterations further, it can
easily become a "that @[EMAIL PROTECTED] competitor is riding my network for
free to access my customers, so I'm just gonna cut them off" type
of discussion
Let me show you again what I res
---
CWLab
Technology Architects
http://www.cwlab.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Butch Evans
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 2:44 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: RE: [WISPA] VOIP / CommPartn