Yep. Very few people (less than 5%) who deploy dense wireless LANs
understand that the interference radius around each access point omni
antenna is 4 times to 8 times (or more) GREATER than the usable
communications radius. People end up putting too many access points too
close together result
I strongly suspect that Alvarion would not "blow this test out of the water"
because they, like Cisco and Aruba, do nothing (so far as I know) to
coordinate transmissions to mitigate self-interference. Meru does, and this
is why it comes out so far ahead.
According to Belanger, at some points in t
CK PROFITO
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:21 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: [WISPA] WLAN stress test uncovers 802.11 performance problems
WLAN stress test uncovers 802.11 performance problems
The tests confirm two troubling issues for high-density nets
Everyone on this li
WLAN stress test uncovers 802.11 performance problems
The tests confirm two troubling issues for high-density nets
Everyone on this list probably already knows this, especially if you have
read Jack's book, but John Cox from Network World did a good job explaining
it. Usage vs. self interference
