An elevated noise floor will push your avg rssi levels up basically
making your acceptable EUM signal levels higher than usual. A typical
EUM under perfect conditions can have link up to -89, but with an
elevated noise floor the acceptable signal level becomes higher and
higher. You'll need
I think a lot depends on what the signal strength is on the CCU (AU)
side. I several links that from the EUM (SU) are worse than -85, but at
the CCU they are better than -78. Mind you these links aren't supper
fast though, especially on the upload. It's okay if they're a lower
usage customer.
Mac OS X (bash) says:
ping -i.4 192.168.7.1
ping: -i interval too short: Operation not permitted
using sudo makes it work.
It might be the same for Linux.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote:
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all
What about using flood ping -f. Does that work in Linux. I use that in Mac OS
X.
Greg
On Sep 11, 2010, at 9:04 PM, Kevin R. Battersby wrote:
On September 11, 2010, Chuck Hogg wrote:
That is from the CCU side. In all of our testing we are seeing high ping
spikes. Is there any other
Part of their mac polling will turn it off if their is not traffic for a while.
If I remember correctly their is a high priority setting that will keep it up.
I will check all that at the office Monday.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 11, 2010, at 8:34 PM, Kevin R. Battersby ke...@battersby.net
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in using this equipment?
With Canopy/UBNT/MikroTik we have pretty much set the standard for QoS
reasons that the signal should not be worse than -75. I have seen another
WISP using this older WaveRider gear, and most of his clients are at -80 to
I had some links like that when we used waverider but it was on sectors with
little interference. They will probably work if you have a low noise floor.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 10, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Chuck Hogg ch...@shelbybb.com wrote:
Does anyone use this equipment or have experience in
