a
> > reason to
> > be more efficient? I'm sure there is a technical reason, that I don't
> > understand, yet.
> >
> > Tom DeReggi
> > RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> > IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
> >
> >
> > - Origina
: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e
Here is the quick answer:
802.16d is a fixed only technology (no mobility) which performs quite
well for delivering broadband to homes and businesses. Highly available.
Secure. More expensive, more scalable and somewhat higher latency
>
> Tom DeReggi
> RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
> IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chuck Bartosch"
> To: "WISPA General List"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.
power levels you can
accommodate. Since you have more spectral space to do the power in.
/Eje
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
-Original Message-
From: "Tom DeReggi"
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:29:57
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e
Chuck,
Tha
understand, yet.
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Chuck Bartosch"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:59 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 802.16e
>
> On Apr
at
would WISPs be using most today in 3650?
Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Baird"
To: "WISPA General List"
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wimax 802.16d v 8
On Apr 21, 2009, at 6:39 PM, Michael Baird wrote:
> Have you deployed it? From my initial research, it appears that the
> bigger vendors Motorola/Alverion are supporting the 802.16e variety,
> while the smaller vendors such as Tranzeo are supporting the 802.16d
> variety. I'm aware of the advanta
Have you deployed it? From my initial research, it appears that the
bigger vendors Motorola/Alverion are supporting the 802.16e variety,
while the smaller vendors such as Tranzeo are supporting the 802.16d
variety. I'm aware of the advantages at the Mac Layer, but why would
802.16d at 3.65 with
Here is the quick answer:
802.16d is a fixed only technology (no mobility) which performs quite
well for delivering broadband to homes and businesses. Highly
available. Secure. More expensive, more scalable and somewhat higher
latency than similar fixed technologies based on 802.11 and other
propri
I'm researching these two technologies and Wimax in general, does anyone
have any firsthand experience with the two current different types of
Wimax, or references to the differences in the two different types of
technologies for broadband fixed rural deployments?
Regards
Michael Baird
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
