-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Eje Gustafsson
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] using multiple 5.3 cards in a Mikrotik
Basically from own experience and testing.
Two cards mounted side by side at a slight
: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 1:01 PM
To: 'WISPA General List'
Subject: Re: [WISPA] using multiple 5.3 cards in a Mikrotik
Basically from own experience and testing.
Two cards mounted side by side at a slight distance even if they are XR5
cards suffers no to minimal problems between them and it goes
I have read numerous discussions on problems regarding self interference
between two mPCI cards inserted in the same SBC, on same Freqs. Some
reporting need for 40Mhz of center channel seperation.
These are the factors...
U.FL vs MMCX connectors
One vs two Antenna Ports on a single mpci card
, April 21, 2009 11:40 AM
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Subject: [WISPA] using multiple 5.3 cards in a Mikrotik
I have read numerous discussions on problems regarding self interference
between two mPCI cards inserted in the same SBC, on same Freqs. Some
reporting need
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] using multiple 5.3 cards in a Mikrotik
Just a dumb question...
If DFS is not certified on MT and is required for 5.3 operation how
could
you drum up support for planning something illegal?
Scott Carullo
Brevard Wireless
321-205-1100 x102
Original
Carullo sc...@brevardwireless.com
To: WISPA General List wireless@wispa.org
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] using multiple 5.3 cards in a Mikrotik
Just a dumb question...
If DFS is not certified on MT and is required for 5.3 operation how could
you drum up support
List
Subject: [WISPA] using multiple 5.3 cards in a Mikrotik
I have read numerous discussions on problems regarding self interference
between two mPCI cards inserted in the same SBC, on same Freqs. Some
reporting need for 40Mhz of center channel seperation.
These are the factors...
U.FL vs MMCX
