Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Windows and Mac native IPSec clients/Nortel VPN

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 At 11:57 -0500 02/15/2006, Lee Badman wrote: Has anybody found a way to leverage the built-in clients (L2TP IPSec)in both Windows and Macintosh for use with the Nortel Contivity VPN routers? This isn't totally helpful for you since we use Cisco 3000

Is PPTP Acceptable Security?

Another question from the VPN angle... Curious how others view PPTP these days as a viable security mechanism for bothe remote access VPN and in wireless environments. Not strong enough? Too easily exploited? Good enough for wireless but not remote access? Moving toward or away from PPTP?

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Is PPTP Acceptable Security?

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 11:50:40 -0500, Lee Badman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Another question from the VPN angle... Curious how others view PPTP these days as a viable security mechanism for bothe remote access VPN and in wireless environments. Not strong enough? Too easily exploited? Good enough

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Is PPTP Acceptable Security?

This thread seems to have morphed from the original question, but I'll note that we have a cisco vpn 3000 w/ Xauth (central username and password) using MGA (server cert authn) to prevent MITM. Use of the vpn is available from the wireless net but not required. We've seen a substantial