-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Nathan,
Nathan Hay wrote:
Would anyone mind sharing their SSID names and a brief
description of their target audience of devices/users?
Like many in the thread we went down the branding route; our system
is called OWL, and we use a big picture
Hello All,
Recent (several months ago) posts left me understanding that no one is quite
comfortable with a 5.x code version that supports the 1140 a/b/g/n AP. Has
there been any changes with that? We use WISMs here at Notre Dame.
Thanks!
Bob Richman
Network Engineer
University of Notre Dame
To the best of my knowledge- 4.2.176 is the stability code. Existing 5 codes
are only for those more adventurous types, or those who are working with TAC on
special builds. And 6.0 will be the next stability release, all as I've been
told. But I'd engage your SE.
Lee H. Badman
Wireless/Network
In our experiences 5.0 was quite unpleasant, but 5.1 and 5.2 have been
stable. We're currently running 5.2.178.0 on 8 WiSMs with about 1800
AP's and ~3500 concurrent users throughout the day. We made the jump
specifically to support the 1140's.
Joe Rogers
Network Admin
University of South
I agree with this 100%. This is what i was told too
Manoj
--
P. Manoj Abeysekera, CWNA
Network Engineer
American University
4200 Wisconsin Ave, NW
Washington DC. 20016
Lee H Badman lhbad...@syr.edu
Sent by: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues
Ditto here too. Waiting for 6.0 MR1 with Legacy Beam Forming (OFDM clients
required).
Bruce T. Johnson | Network Engineer | Partners Healthcare
Network Engineering | 617.726.9662 | Pager: 31633 | bjohns...@partners.org |
149 13th Street, 10th Floor, Mailstop 10055B, Charlestown, Ma 02129
