You can't do a direct apples to oranges comparison between wired and wireless
bandwidth. Remember, that wired connection is one gig in each direction for an
aggregate of two gig of bandwidth, compared with the total half duplex 1.3 (in
ideal conditions) on wave 1.
--
Sent from my Android device
The 802.11ac supports 1.3GB, but the AP only has a 1GB wired connection.
802.11ac with 4x4 multiple-input multiple-output
(MIMO) technology with three spatial streams, offering sustained
1.3-Gbps rates over a greater range for more capacity and reliability
than competing access points.
Inter
On 04/10/13 05:23, Andy Page wrote:
> For those interested, Cisco released information about their new 3700
> series access point with built-in 802.11ac. Likely won’t be able to
> purchase it for at least a month or so.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps13367/data_s
Double Amen
-dan
Sent from a mobile phone with a tiny keyboard
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 5:45 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
>
> Amen Brothu!
> Pete M.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 5:31 PM, "Anders Nilsson"
> wrote:
>
>> Great that they invest in further development in new
Amen Brothu!
Pete M.
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 3, 2013, at 5:31 PM, "Anders Nilsson"
mailto:anders.nils...@adm.umu.se>> wrote:
Great that they invest in further development in new 802.11ac APs
Now if they only could do the same with their poorly performing Prime
Infrastructure product. ;)
Chee
Great that they invest in further development in new 802.11ac APs
Now if they only could do the same with their poorly performing Prime
Infrastructure product. ;)
Cheers
Anders Nilsson
Network specialist
Umeå University
Sweden
Från: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listse
For those interested, Cisco released information about their new 3700 series
access point with built-in 802.11ac. Likely won't be able to purchase it for at
least a month or so.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/wireless/ps5678/ps13367/data_sheet_c78-729421.html
--
Andy Page
Network De
Can I ask what led to making this change? I am struggling trying to understand
moving from a default of 10 minutes to 24 hours and the impact. I have been
reading the documentation and reference for this setting in trying to determine
if this is something I should implement but there is very lit
We set this to be 1 hour.
---
Dennis Xu
Analyst 3, Network Infrastructure
Computing and Communications Services(CCS)
University of Guelph
519-824-4120 Ext 56217
d...@uoguelph.ca
www.uoguelph.ca/ccs
- Original Message -
From: "Jeffrey Sessler"
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Sen
The original DCA algorithm prior to 6.0 code was problematic if you had a lots of APs. A change to a single AP could result in a cascade change to the rest of the radios in the same RF neighborhood. This could happen within a building, or if AP's in adjacent building could see each other, even
I sent ours to change once every 24 hours but made sure I set it at 5am. This way the channels will change at 5am when there is less likelihood of affecting anyone. Depending on your channel sensitivity you could see alot of ap's flipping channels throughout the day if its set for 10 minutes but I
I use 24 hours. It was originally at 5 minutes and I found clients
dropping and reconnecting regularly when the channels changed.
Nathan Hay
Network Engineer | NOC
WinWholesale Inc.
888-225-5947
From: Mark Duling
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU,
Date: 10/03/2013 01:59 PM
Subjec
A long time ago I increased the interval for this up to a pretty high
setting from the default (I think it was 10 min) at the suggestion of
TAC engineer to stop them from changing channels so frequently.
802.11x > RRM > Dynamic Channel Assignment (DCA)
I have no evidence that there is any issue w
Good morning,
I've used a free trial of the android app Rapid Inventory from TEC-IT
for quick inventorying. We had 42 IP phones come in last summer for a
new building project and it made a breeze of collecting the serials and
mac addresses along with exporting to a CSV/XML/Google Drive
Spreadsh
Ditto on blocking DCMA. We're using ASA-CX module to do it and it seems to
do the job well. I'm curious as to what other devices/methods y'all are
using that have been effective in blocking bittorrent.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 9:34 PM, Byron Sayres wrote:
> We block all P2P and have no problems
We're using Choice Ticketing so your mileage may vary with this, but our group
uses a Linear Pro Wireless Barcode Scanner jacket that goes over an iPod 4
Touch and an app called RDP tap. They seem to be VERY happy with these after
dealing with the specialty Windows Mobile scanners.
Eric Barnet
I am not totally sure, but I believe we are mainly using Motorola (Symbol)
scanners running Windows Mobile 6.
Bruce Osborne
Network Engineer
IT Network Services
(434) 592-4229
Liberty University | Training Champions for Christ since 1971
-Original Message-
From: Brian David [mailto
17 matches
Mail list logo
