Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC5508

2016-03-25 Thread Julian Y Koh
On Fri Mar 25 2016 06:40:48 CDT, Lee H Badman wrote: > > It's pretty sad these questions even have to be asked, isn't it? The code > culture has become one where bugs are guaranteed and if we get mediocrity out > if the vendor, we celebrate it. I don't know if I've quite

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC5508

2016-03-25 Thread Scott Fortin
After playing musical-APs to remove all incompatible 1130/1240 models we upgraded our 5508s off of code version 7.6.120.0 (deferred release) to fix a reboot issue. Since all our APs were compatible with 8.2.100.0 (early release) we decided to try it out. The upgrade went well - all our APs came

Alternatives to PI for Cisco WLAN

2016-03-25 Thread Lee H Badman
For those of you that moved away from Cisco's PI, what have you gone to? And how has it worked? Lee Badman (mobile) ** Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group discussion list can be found at http://www.educause.edu/groups/.

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC5508

2016-03-25 Thread Lee H Badman
It's pretty sad these questions even have to be asked, isn't it? The code culture has become one where bugs are guaranteed and if we get mediocrity out if the vendor, we celebrate it. Wierd times. Lee Badman Network Architect/Wireless TME Syracuse University 315.443.3003 -Original

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco WLC5508

2016-03-25 Thread Mathieu Sturm
Thank you for all the information guys. I know the question has been asked before. Just wanted to know because of the release of the new wave 2 ap’s which we’d like to test and still have a good working environment. Right now we’re on 7.6.130 which is pretty stable but is a couple of years old