Given my understanding of the way arp works, not sure I understand how it is
possible for a large subnet to cause a client arp table to become exhausted
unless that client for some reason is directly communicating with all of the
other endpoints on the large subnet.
My understanding is that
Mdns ap
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/bonjour/7-5/Bonjour_Gateway_Phase-2_WLC_software_release_7-5.html#pgfId-44412
On Monday, August 1, 2016, Legge, Jeffry wrote:
> We are currently using WISM2’s on flat L2 to Distribution switches. We
> have
We are currently using WISM2's on flat L2 to Distribution switches. We have
just begun L3 from a building to the Core and WISM2's still on Distribution.
The wireless via AP groups gets tunneled through to WISM. Wired is on a
separate L2 behind L3 to Core so Wism does not see it. Does anyone
Good morning,
Currently we have a home grown wireless registration system in place that
is becoming obsolete. We are getting ready to refresh our Cisco AP’s, and
I’m writing to see if anyone has any positive/negative issues in using
Cisco ISE for individual “self” registration on your wireless
Have you considered products other than Cisco ACS?
We use Aruba ClearPass for RADIUS and are on the process of migrating from ACS
to ClearPass for TACACS on Cisco switches.
Of course, there is FreeRADIUS and I believe there is a free .net-based TACACS
solution.
Bruce Osborne
Wireless