I'll second the false DFS events, or perhaps more accurately said
"alleged" DFS events. I'm working with TAC now to figure out whether we
really have radar or was it the upgrade from 7.6.130 to 8.0.120 that did it.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermo
Interesting. Would you be willing to share what your average user
consumes per month?
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
On 9/14/2015 7:18 AM, Osborne, Bruce W (Network Services) wrote:
We map username to password and use bandwidth management to limit the
Just to clarify, the type of bracket shown here is what I'm looking for:
http://www.terra-wave.com/shop/compact-horizontal-wall-mount-w-cover-and-universal-tbar-mounting-plate-p-3697.html?utm_source=et.ventev.com&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=VA78
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engine
to be screwed to a standard single gang
electrical box.
Anybody have any other recommendations?
Thanks,
-dan
--
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at
Is it only 11a radios? Are you getting DFS events? If so, I'm dealing
with this right now with TAC. Check your AP log for a DFS message.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
On 9/10/15 12:32 PM, Gregg Heimer wrote:
Anyone with Cisco APs and Cisco Prime get thes
Engineering build? I'm not seeing it available for download.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
On 8/31/15 10:03 AM, Scharloo, Gertjan wrote:
Solution is 8.0.120.3 (dfs problem)
From: EDUCAUSE Listserv <mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU>>
Any update on the bug fix for the flapping 5ghz radios in 8.0.120? I'm
seeing a fair amount of them on my 3702i's.
Thanks!
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
On 7/28/15 4:45 AM, Scharloo, Gertjan wrote:
Hi Lee,
The 5 GHz radio message is a DFS problem a
e clients are 802.11r capable, for example, Apple devices on version 6
and above.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/wireless/technology/wlc/8-0/82463-wlc-config-best-practice.html#pgfId-380025
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
On 7/1/2015 9:55 AM, Kevin McCormick wr
+1
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/11/2015 10:32 AM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Excellent piece, Bob. Thanks very much for sharing.
Lee Badman
Wireless/Network Architect
ITS, Syracuse University
315.443.3003
(Blog: http
That's the conclusion I've come to. It's not a vendor thing, it's an
https thing.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
On 12/4/2014 3:31 PM, Trent Hurt wrote:
Anyone figure anyway around this? It’s either not enable it and folks
don’t get the cap
I received this email last night from her:
"I have had much better connection, thank you again! Skype and
BlackBoard are working well!"
So needless to say I will be encouraging my Macbook students to make
sure they are up-to-date with upgrades.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
U
ting table (netstat -nr) and sure enough, no default gateway. I
disabled and reenabled WiFi and it was fine.
That's the first time I've seen that behavior.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 10/2/2014 1:50 PM, Ashfield, Matt (N
fact that they have roamed from one AP
to another and the roam is taking so long that some clients end up
needing to go through the DHCP process again. The odd thing is that
when I look at the RSSI for the client, it's in the high -60s/low -70s,
so I don't know why the are roaming.
-d
It's interesting that this is still a fix for these types of issues. We
have been running v6 on our Cisco wireless infrastructure for parts of 3
academic years now (since winter of 2012) and have not had to do this.
Not saying it won't help, just interesting.
-dan
Dan Briss
Isn't the client's browser going to complain about a domain name
mismatch b/c of the redirect to the https WebAuth page? There's no way
to fix that, is there?
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 8/19/14, 9:54 PM,
While I agree that Radius authentication would be a nice option, getting
Apple to add an enterprise feature like that is probably pushing it for
a "consumer" device. I'm just happy they added in Enterprise 802.1x for
wireless.
:)
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University
Unless your name is Apple. :)
I do agree with you, though.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 3/12/14, 9:58 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
One thing about application adoption is that you don't want to have to force
the network to chan
Yah, or the router vendors will need to do some fancy inspection to
watch for the initial TCP connection that gets made so it knows to let
the UDP connection back in. Like for FTP and the other protocols that
behave in a similar manner.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of
just give up.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 3/12/14, 4:14 PM, Julian Y Koh wrote:
On Wed Mar 12 2014 15:11:34 CDT, Julian Y Koh wrote:
I don’t think that all AppleTV units have Bluetooth. I’m not exactly sure
which revs
Allow AAA override" setting on the WLCs.
With this solution it doesn't matter which SSID the user's device
remembers, they get the access they need.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 3/10/2014 12:35 PM, Frank Sweets
Doesn't look promising:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6114
I'm not seeing any mention of Wireless fixes/enhancements.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/25/14, 1:21 PM, Wright, Don wrote:
Looks like MacOS 10.
2 is?
Not having to forklift 802.3at switching/mid-spans is a big deal,
I think.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/7/14, 10:08 PM, Jason Cook
M, Tristan Gulyas wrote:
Hi,
I can confirm that this is an issue for us as well.
Tristan
On 24 Jan 2014, at 5:12 am, Dan Brisson wrote:
Very interesting. I had obviously not found that supportforums post. Thanks
for sending it along.
It does make me wonder why Cisco would offer up a &q
Good to know re: 7.6. I am curious, though, about the Prime version.
We are on 2.0 and looking at the 7.6 release notes shows this:
Cisco Prime Infrastructure 1.4.1 is needed to manage Cisco WLC software
Release 7.6.100.0.
We are in the same boat as Matt - don't really use Prime to "manage"
p Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Dan Brisson
Sent: 23 January 2014 16:41
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] 3700 AP Survey Mode with 80Mhz channels
Wondering if anyone has had a chance to play with the new Cisco 3700 AP
running the autono
Wondering if anyone has had a chance to play with the new Cisco 3700 AP
running the autonomous "Site Survey only" code. I was able to load the
code successfully but when I configure the 11ac radio for 80Mhz
channels, no 11ac or 11n clients can see the SSID. If I drop it to
40Mhz everything i
+1 to that.
-dan
On 1/23/2014 9:28 AM, Wright, Don wrote:
Anyone have concerns about making the trust setting changes to the
certificate chain? I'm thinking of the intermediate certs mostly.
Setting "always trust" on a client machine just makes me a little
uncomfortable.
- Don
On Tue,
Yikes, didn't think they were weak but it has been a while since I've
looked. Based on that, are folks aiming to accommodate that weak of a
signal at -65 or close to that?
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 12/12/1
ive RSSI values.
Curious what folks think of that strategy. Hopefully this is close
enough to the main topic to not be considered hijacking. I had been
meaning to get an email out on this topic.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.e
g new APs on a semi-frequent basis.
-dan
On 12/9/2013 9:12 AM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Will be later in the week, but has been available to some on the down low.
*From:*The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] *On Behalf Of *Dan Br
I'm still not seeing 7.6 available for download. Am I missing it?
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 12/9/2013 9:05 AM, Lee H Badman wrote:
With the new 3700 shipping, wondering if anyone has an early sense of
7.6 stability?
T
;re in the same configuration as you are.
Hit me off-list if you'd like to compare configs.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 11/25/2013 9:57 AM, Joe Rogers wrote:
We've been running IPv6 on our Cisco wireless infrastruct
That's encryption. Ryan is asking
about the authentication method.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 11/21/2013 4:19 PM, Watters, John
Same exact scenario for us. We were able to disable the single LED
that's on our Cisco APs.
In a couple buildings we had to put them in the hallways due to
construction but the rest are in student rooms. In the hallways
buildings, we definitely have our most busy air.
-dan
Dan Br
tantly changing channels and Tx
Power on some APs.
I do think I'm going to disable Client Load Balancing, but it is not the
primary cause of the issues. Happy to share war stories if anyone out
there is interested.
Thanks again.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Ve
I should have also mentioned that we are on 7.4.110 for all of our
controllers.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 10/23/2013 9:40 AM, Dan Brisson wrote:
Lee,
We do have v6 enabled for our main campus SSID. We actually did that
Lee,
We do have v6 enabled for our main campus SSID. We actually did that
last year over winter break and found that it didn't cause any issues.
At least none that we could attribute.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.ed
'm not
convinced that will help, but also curious if folks have thoughts on
that recommendation.
Thanks,
-dan
--
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE
And here, although our Bookstore folks are using a Mac Mini with
Internet Sharing enabled. The Mac Mini is running the Tune&Play software.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 10/10/13 3:29 PM, Lee H Badman wrote:
Same same
New Macbook Air's already have 802.11ac radios.
If you have 3560X PoEs, you're all set since they do PoE+.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 10/4/13 8:09 AM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
I agree, especially since there lik
Double Amen
-dan
Sent from a mobile phone with a tiny keyboard
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 5:45 PM, Peter P Morrissey wrote:
>
> Amen Brothu!
> Pete M.
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 5:31 PM, "Anders Nilsson"
> wrote:
>
>> Great that they invest in further development in new
erred to use our
Campus WLCs, the exposure was low enough that we didn't want to waste
much more time on it.
If someone does get Bonjour gateway working though, I'd love to hear
about it. :)
That's basically all of the info I have but if anyone has any more
questions, I'm
alities to them that are making it hard for the AP to hear the
smartphones low-powered signal. In those instances we've had to boost
the power of nearby APs or add an additional AP.
Not sure if that helps but wanted to let you know what we've seen.
Regards,
Dan Brisson
Network Engin
I'm hopeful that the 3700 will only need 802.3af and not the Enhanced PoE that
the 3602+ac module needs.
-dan
Sent from a mobile phone with a tiny keyboard
On Jul 1, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Andy Page wrote:
> There is a 3700 coming out next year that will have ac built in. Not sure
> what the p
, feel free to contact me directly
off-list.
Regards,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 12/19/2012 8:36 AM, David Robertson wrote:
We are looking at how we install wireless in our Residence Halls for
coverage. Currently we only p
h some experience in either or both of these areas willing to
share?
Thanks,
-dan
--
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
**
Participation and subscription information for this EDUCAUSE Constituent Group
discussion list can be found at htt
ry to
figure out what is really happening. TAC suspects that whatever it
is, the switch is "losing" the APs ip in the dhcp snooping
database. Once the AP re-DHCPs, everything is fine.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
d
,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/6/2012 2:46 PM, Jeffrey Sessler wrote:
Dan,
If you extend the DHCP lease duration of the AP's, and
reenable DAI and IP SV, what happens
ng it, for whatever reason.
DHCP snooping is still enabled on the switches that we disabled DAI
and IP Source-verify.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/6/2012 3:17 PM, Garry Pe
DAI and/or IP Source verify could be the cause.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/1/2012 2:38 PM, Dan Brisson wrote:
Ah right, yes, 'mls qos' is NOT configured on any of the
h, we had to go in the
ceiling in one of our newer, bigger complexes. I'm going to turn
off DAI and IP Source verify there and see if the drops stop.
Will let folks know what I find.
Thanks!
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph
Good question. Turns out the APs use UTC time, which appears to be correct:
AP#sh clock
*17:29:03.737 UTC Wed Feb 1 2012
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/1/2012 12:11 PM, Craig Eyre wrote:
Dan,
What time is your controller
at is unique to this part
of campus as we haven't yet rolled that out to the entire admin
side.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/1/2012 10:23 AM, Mike King wrote:
O
state to up
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/1/2012 10:30 AM, Mike Goebel wrote:
Dan, have you tried logging into the AP itself and checking the logs
by chance?
Mike
On 2/1/2012 10:03 AM, Dan Brisson wrote:
It does seem as
the General tab for an AP:
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/1/2012 9:26 AM, Garry Peirce wrote:
I think you have some of us all getting curious! ;-)
Could you put a historically stable a
power limiting some functionality for an
AP. I thought that was mostly how much power would be supplied to
radios, though.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 2/1/2012 9:20 AM, Craig Eyre wrote:
Dan,
Do your admin ap's
ession, join to WiSMs, not 5508s.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 1/31/2012 8:44 PM, Garry Peirce wrote:
We have ~1400 (1240s->3502's) running 7.0.116 and have no such issues.
I would guess at packet loss as well
Interesting theory. We do use DHCP, although we're using DHCP across
the entire campus so if this was the case, I would think we'd see more
of it, not just in the dense student areas.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.
.
Thanks,
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 1/31/2012 4:32 PM, Watters, John wrote:
We are also a
but still haven't found a common
thread.
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 1/31/12 9:26 AM, Mike King wrote:
Back in the bad old 4.0 code days (4 + years ago), I hit a bug when
more than 25 people associated to an access p
Our AP subnets are /24s and latency appears to be under <1ms, which is
what I would expect as everything is fiber connected.
Thanks!
-dan
Dan Brisson
Network Engineer
University of Vermont
(Ph) 802.656.8111
dbris...@uvm.edu
On 1/31/12 8:46 AM, Mike Goebel wrote:
How big are your subn
o that,
when the students left for break, the AP drops stopped. They came back,
and sure enough, the drops start up again.
I will say that the AP always joins back immediately, but for the time
that it does drop A) I'm sure connectivity is affected in that area and
B) we get an email.
Anyo
62 matches
Mail list logo
