RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Authentication method comparison

2007-10-31 Thread Hector J Rios
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Authentication method comparison Jonn Martell wrote: > Hi Donald, > > You don't need to have AD to support PEAP. Your RADIUS/LDAP > infrastructure does need to support MSCHAPv2 (aka "native NT users and > domains").

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Authentication method comparison

2007-10-24 Thread Karl Reuss
Jonn Martell wrote: Hi Donald, You don't need to have AD to support PEAP. Your RADIUS/LDAP infrastructure does need to support MSCHAPv2 (aka "native NT users and domains"). Look how RADIATOR does it for a good "off-the-shelf" solution to supporting PEAP on a non-Microsoft backend. One thing

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Authentication method comparison

2007-10-23 Thread Jonn Martell
Hi Donald, You don't need to have AD to support PEAP. Your RADIUS/LDAP infrastructure does need to support MSCHAPv2 (aka "native NT users and domains"). Look how RADIATOR does it for a good "off-the-shelf" solution to supporting PEAP on a non-Microsoft backend. ... Jonn Martell, CWNE On 10/23

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Authentication method comparison

2007-10-23 Thread King, Michael
State College From: Wright, Donald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 1:56 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Authentication method comparison We currently have a WPA wlan using TTLS as the auth method and SecureW2 for