John,
> These open APs run on a restricted network, preventing harm from our
> internal network, and restricted from conducting common attacks
> on the Internet.
I'm curious how you "restrict them from conducting common attacks on the
Internet." Do you turn off port 80, and thus prevent the myria
Hi John-
Wondering why you chose dedicated APs for the open network, versus an
open SSID on all APs?
Regards-
Lee
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 3/21/2007 11:36:55 AM >>>
Southwestern University transitioned from open authentication to
802.1x
in Aug of 2005.
A big step in the conversion was to leave
007 11:23 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] First-time rollout of 802.1x, opening of Fall semester
madness
Here at Syracuse University, we are feeling pretty good about 802.1x and will
be transitioning to it (for the wireless network only) before the Fall
semester.
Lee,
Our 802.1x adoption is not recent, but definitely not successful!
less than a hundred users out of 4000-5000 joining the WLAN daily.
We never faced the tidal wave. Users gave up very fast.
Wireless is about convenience, 802.1x is not!
(and I'm writing this email over Wireless...non 1x ;-)
We
Hi Lee,
1. Based on my experience at UBC, the captive portal lowest "common
denominator" network will continue to be the best way to bootstrap
users for 802.1x/WPA/WPA2 (until MS and Apple builds something
better).
It's interesting to see that the corporate world is catching up by
adding captive
