-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue Nov 01 2011 13:25:20 Central Time, Lee H Badman wrote:
>
> For those of you with large (10,000 + users) RADIUS deployments, what servers
> are you using and what are your points of pain and/or appreciation?
We're currently using Steel Belted
Lee,
I will speak as UTK and eduroam-US.
We see a lot of satisfaction with the following three RADIUS flavors:
-RADIATOR (supported, very affordable, and PERL based...easy to customize,
keeps up with innovations: RadSec, CUI,...)
-FreeRADIUS (open Source, FREE, C based, support community, keeps
Lee,
If you want to see some configuration examples
for six RADIUS flavors go there:
https://www.eduroamus.org/radius_configuration
This will not give you examples of how to do PEAP, but you will have a good idea
of how the various flavors are configured for proxying.
Philippe
On Nov 1, 2011, a
ana State University
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:25 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+
t; Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2011 1:25 PM
> To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
> Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client Environments?
>
> We’re feeling some frustration with our current RADIUS solution (ACS 5,
> virtual appliances) that are frequently att
AUSE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client
> Environments?
>
> +1 for FreeRADIUS ;)
>
> -Arran
>
> On 1 Nov 2011, at 20:19, Hector J Rios wrote:
>
>
>
> We've been running FreeRADIUS on freeBSD since 2008 and
Freeradius
We support TTLS/PAP with a MIT Kerberos backend.
Typical day we do 330K authentications in a day, with about 18K unique
users. Like U of M,
most are smart phones.
We have 2 servers handling this.
John Kalbach Information Technology Services
kalb...@psu.edu
Lee,
We're using the Avaya's Identity Engines Ignition product. It's a
virtual appliance, we run a pair in HA mode, and it's servicing requests
for 10K+ users.
We had been using Ignition back when idEngines was around, followed it
to Nortel, and then to Avaya. We were particularly interested in
ember 01, 2011 2:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] RADIUS Server preference for 10K+ Client
Environments?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue Nov 01 2011 13:25:20 Central Time, Lee H Badman wrote:
>
> For those of you with large (10,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed Nov 02 2011 08:09:21 Central Time, Lee H Badman wrote:
>
> Out of curiosity, can you describe what Juniper's replacement for SBR is
> missing?
Biggest thing was IP pools, since we assign IP addresses to our traditional VPN
clients via RADIUS
Hi Lee,
> For those of you with large (10,000 + users) RADIUS deployments, what
> servers are you using and what are your points of pain and/or
> appreciation?
We're using Radiator. No real points of pain; what we appreciate are the
features to manipulate requests and support all kinds of authent
We Freeradius on RH5.X supporting PEAP/MSCHAP with AD for dot1x and LDAP
for VPN.
We have two production wireless that see about 8000-9000 users per day
15000 over the month.
no real pain points except some issues to resolve when RH gets upgraded.
file permissions/SE Linux caused the most i
We use FreeRadius 2.1.x servers running on pair HP DL360-G7s with Linux.
We have around 8k simultaneous users online at any one time.
Authentication type is 802.1x MS-CHAPv2/PEAP which is proxied though
the FreeRadius servers to a cluster of MS AD servers, where our
single-sign-on system terminate
13 matches
Mail list logo
