Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-10-30 Thread John J. Brassil
That's pretty much what I'm shooting for - if we need to relax to 36 mpbs in a few spots to save another AP that's fine, but if figure if we're going to support VoFi we're going to need that kind of density/bandwidth anyway. --On Friday, October 29, 2004 11:14 PM -0500 Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-10-30 Thread Frank Bulk - iNAME.com
I guess what my concern is that if you make 48 Mbps your minimum rate you'll need an access point in each room. ;) Even at 36 Mbps, I'm guessing an AP in every second or third room.   VoWLAN can be accomplished via several means.  One way is to use one band for it, ie 802.11a for voice, and then

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-10-31 Thread John J. Brassil
--On Saturday, October 30, 2004 6:55 PM -0500 Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I guess what my concern is that if you make 48 Mbps your minimum rate you'll need an access point in each room. ;) Even at 36 Mbps, I'm guessing an AP in every second or third room. We've got about 50 a/g APs on cam

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-11-01 Thread Reinhard, Ron
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 8:20 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI   I guess what my concern is that if you make 48 Mbps your minimum rate you'll need an access point in each room. ;) Even at 36 Mbps, I'm guessing an AP in e

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-11-01 Thread debbie fligor
At 9:33 -0500 11/1/04, Reinhard, Ron wrote: I have personally performed throughput testing on the Meru 802.11b products. They do provide significantly increased overall throughput via their QOS and the number of flows obtainable is much greater than Cisco. Also, each flow is given equitable bandw

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-11-01 Thread Frank Bulk - iNAME.com
John:   I'm impressed that you get the higher rates that you do, but drywall likely helps a lot.  When you mention the 60 to 80 foot radius, what do you consider the higher 11a date rates to be?  24 and up?   I know of one other Meru implementation at a university, but they are not on this listse

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI

2004-11-01 Thread John J. Brassil
--On Monday, November 01, 2004 5:06 PM -0600 Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: John: I'm impressed that you get the higher rates that you do, but drywall likely helps a lot. When you mention the 60 to 80 foot radius, what do you consider the higher 11a date rates to be? 24 and up? 48 and 54,

AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI)

2004-11-02 Thread Chris Hessing
> Anyone else out there want to share who your wireless vendors are? I've heard a lot > about Chantry, Cisco, Enterasys, Proxim and some of Airespace, but not Legra, Aruba, > Foundry, or Extreme. We have started to deploy Trapeze equipment. For reasons I will go in to below. (For anyone that

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI)

2004-11-02 Thread Ruiz, Mike
m/hws -Original Message- From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hessing Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI) > Anyone

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI)

2004-11-02 Thread Eve Ellsworth
Perhaps you may want to look into Vivato -Original Message- From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hessing Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt