That's pretty much what I'm shooting for - if we need to relax to 36 mpbs
in a few spots to save another AP that's fine, but if figure if we're going
to support VoFi we're going to need that kind of density/bandwidth anyway.
--On Friday, October 29, 2004 11:14 PM -0500 Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess what my concern is that if you make 48 Mbps your minimum rate you'll need an access point in each room. ;)
Even at 36 Mbps, I'm guessing an AP in every second or third room.
VoWLAN can be accomplished via several means. One way is to use one band for it, ie 802.11a for voice, and then
--On Saturday, October 30, 2004 6:55 PM -0500 Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I guess what my concern is that if you make 48 Mbps your minimum rate
you'll need an access point in each room. ;)
Even at 36 Mbps, I'm guessing an AP in every second or third room.
We've got about 50 a/g APs on cam
Sent: Saturday,
October 30, 2004 8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN]
Vanderbilt Residential Housing RFI
I guess what my concern is that if
you make 48 Mbps your minimum rate you'll need an access point in each room. ;)
Even at 36 Mbps, I'm guessing an AP
in e
At 9:33 -0500 11/1/04, Reinhard, Ron wrote:
I have personally performed throughput testing on the Meru 802.11b
products. They do provide significantly increased overall
throughput via their QOS and the number of flows obtainable is much
greater than Cisco. Also, each flow is given equitable bandw
John:
I'm impressed that you get the higher rates that you do, but drywall likely helps a lot. When you mention the 60 to 80 foot radius, what do you consider the higher 11a date rates to be? 24 and up?
I know of one other Meru implementation at a university, but they are not on this listse
--On Monday, November 01, 2004 5:06 PM -0600 Frank Bulk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
John:
I'm impressed that you get the higher rates that you do, but drywall
likely helps a lot. When you mention the 60 to 80 foot radius, what do
you consider the higher 11a date rates to be? 24 and up?
48 and 54,
> Anyone else out there want to share who your wireless vendors are? I've heard a lot
> about Chantry, Cisco, Enterasys, Proxim and some of Airespace, but not Legra, Aruba,
> Foundry, or Extreme.
We have started to deploy Trapeze equipment. For reasons I will go in to
below. (For anyone that
m/hws
-Original Message-
From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hessing
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt
Residential Housing RFI)
> Anyone
Perhaps you may want to look into Vivato
-Original Message-
From: 802.11 wireless issues listserv
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Hessing
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] AP Vendors ( WAS : Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] Vanderbilt
10 matches
Mail list logo