We also use Enterasys for the reasons already mentioned by others.
I recommend adding them to your list of vendors to talk to.
Greg Briggs
Network Manager
Pacific Lutheran University
253-538-5666
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Benjamin Parker wrote:
> We also currently use Enterasys wireless
We also currently use Enterasys wireless and have for several years through
several products. We currently have around 300 of the 3610 AP's and 60 or
so of the older Trapeze re branded products. We are very pleased with the
access points and with our support from Enterasys as a whole. All support
i
Hi Joshua,
We use Enterasys wireless and switches, as well as their NAC product and
Netsight management system (which does switches as well). We have 100
APs currently, which will rise to 150 when the new 3710 AP comes out
(April I'm currently told). Right now we have just under 1000 clients
assoc
Count me in as well on Juniper.
Currently 680 AP's spread over 7 buildings in 3 cities, 2 HA
controller pairs in each city.
Average we have > 7000 concurrent users. "It just works" !
Firmware upgrades are a no-brainer, Q&A process is firmly in place,
they are conservative on adding new features an
+1 for the Juniper gear. We're currently at about 650 APs (mostly the 532 3x3
stream AP, with the last legacy ones slated to be replaced this summer) and
three 2800 controllers.
Just two more points to add:
- RingMaster is slated to be replaced by the not-yet-released Network
Director tool,
Hi Educause:
We here at Minnesota (Twin Cities and Morris) are a pretty large
Juniper (Used to be Trapeze wireless) shop.
We are also a Cisco shop.
35 MX-2800 contollers
5000 access points, all 802.11n
20,000 peak users.
How are the reporting features?
Always been pretty good, hugely improved l
