RE: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-19 Thread Frank Bulk - iNAME
-Original Message- From: Dale W. Carder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 9:10 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at On Nov 18, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Kevin Miller wrote: One thing to note is that 300Mbps

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-19 Thread Jon Freeman
, 2007 5:49 AM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at Do any of the bands have lesser/no DFS requirements? If so, those are will be more attractive. Frank -Original Message- From: Jon Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-19 Thread ray
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007, Jon Freeman wrote: As higher level standards in 802.11 call for more AP control, this will become more valuable in ensuring less co-channel interference across heterogeneous environments. But, it will also mean less need for IT intervention as the access device will make

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-18 Thread Kevin Miller
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at Good points, Philippe. For those organizations that want to be bleeding edge, I don't think PoE concerns are going to hold them back. Every vendor has a way to address them today in a way that's not a show-stopper. Has anyone heard

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-18 Thread Dale W. Carder
On Nov 18, 2007, at 7:06 PM, Kevin Miller wrote: One thing to note is that 300Mbps as a symbol rate is only possible with 40MHz channels (versus the 20MHz standard width for 802.11a/b/ g) .. which in 2.4GHz takes you from 3 non-overlapping to 1 non- overlapping. In 5GHz you have at least 8

Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-17 Thread Justin Dover
- From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:07 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at Good points, Philippe. For those organizations that want to be bleeding edge, I don't think PoE concerns

RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-16 Thread Lee Weers
they hadn't decided on 33 or 48 watts of power per port. -Original Message- From: Frank Bulk - iNAME [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 8:07 PM To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at Good points, Philippe. For those

RE: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-16 Thread Frank Bulk
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n tied to 802.3at I heard from Cisco 2 days ago that the 3750E and the modules that will power their 1252 will be availble around the end of Dec/Januarary time frame. I'm trying to pry out of HP if the 5400's and 3500's will be firmware upgradable

802.11n tied to 802.3at

2007-11-15 Thread Philippe Hanset
Following the trail of discussion about 802.11n, I wouldn't be buying 802.11n before 802.3at (AKA Power over Ethernet PLUS) gears are on the market. By then, 802.11n vendors should have only one Ethernet port to the AP. One port will bring savings on PoE injectors, Cabling, and even switchports