Cisco released their new WLSM module for the Catalyst 6500 a few weeks ago. I work for a magazine and we are examining this product and it's related components.
Is anyone on this listserv actually planning on deploying the WLSM? Is the requirement of a SUP720 a limitation for it's considerat
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Bulk - iNAME.comSent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 9:51 PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco's new WLSM
Cisco released their new WLSM module for the Catalyst 6500 a few weeks ago. I work for a magazine and we are examining this product and
ulk - iNAME.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2004 8:40 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [WIRELESS-LAN] Cisco's new WLSM
Matt:
That's a good question about the SUP720 requirement, the same one that we had.
- From what what we were told, previous SUP's d
Jeff:
Let's be clear that the WLSM is not superset of WLSE's features. The WLSM is an advanced WDS, and the WLSE will continue to play an extended role in managing access points, monitoring for rogues, load-balancing power, etc. You don't need the WLSE to run the new WLSM blade, but most orga
