Hi Bruce,
We didn't have a formal test plan, but have had many experiences I am
more than willing to share.
Surveying was pretty interesting, as we deployed before there were any
11n capable tools available. Back in the summer of 2007, we pretty much
just had to make some assumptions and then
@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Hi Bruce,
We didn't have a formal test plan, but have had many experiences I am
more than willing to share.
Surveying was pretty interesting, as we deployed before there were any
11n capable tools available. Back in the summer
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Thank you Matt,
I appreciate the feedback and may want to get more of your Meru
experiences
offline. A 5GHz RSSI (PHY) survey seems to be the common denominator
for legacy
and .11n clients. Its likely this provides adequate coverage for 2.4GHz
-
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Johnson, Bruce
T
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:25 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Thank you Matt,
I appreciate
Listserv
[mailto:wireless-...@listserv.educause.edu] On Behalf Of Lee H Badman
Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2009 10:42 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
I had an interesting exchange with Ekahau (we use them and AirMagnet)
about how 11n should change
...@partners.org
From: The EDUCAUSE Wireless Issues Constituent Group Listserv on behalf of
Barber, Matt
Sent: Thu 1/29/2009 11:07 AM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] 802.11n testplans
Yeah, that is something I should have mentioned