of the way.
(author unknown)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kaegler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 3:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] ARP floods with Cisco APs - could this be
the bug?
At 1:00 PM -0500 7/23/07, Frank Bulk w
m: Michael Kaegler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 3:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] ARP floods with Cisco APs - could this be
the bug?
At 1:00 PM -0500 7/23/07, Frank Bulk wrote:
>Joe:
>No, I don't think so, as this relates t
I believe Duke runs both styles.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kaegler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 2:30 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUCAUSE.EDU
Subject: Re: [WIRELESS-LAN] ARP floods with Cisco APs - could this be the
bug?
At 1:00 PM -0500 7/23/07
] ARP floods with Cisco APs - could this be the bug?
It is unclear to me if the solution provided was a configuration correction or
update to the current revision of code or beta code or something else. It is
worded so vague it could be anything. Only thing clear is Cisco helped them fix
it.
Be
It is unclear to me if the solution provided was a configuration
correction or update to the current revision of code or beta code or
something else. It is worded so vague it could be anything. Only thing
clear is Cisco helped them fix it.
Besides with Networkers going on this week, any new code
At 1:00 PM -0500 7/23/07, Frank Bulk wrote:
Joe:
No, I don't think so, as this relates to the IOS versions of Cisco's
product, and it's my understanding that Duke uses the LWAPP
configuration.
At 5:35 PM -0400 7/13/07, Kevin Miller wrote:
For the last week or so, we have seen some unusual p
Joe:
No, I don’t think so, as this relates to the IOS versions of Cisco’s product,
and it’s my understanding that Duke uses the LWAPP configuration.
Kind regards,
Frank
From: Joseph Karam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 12:56 PM
To: WIRELESS-LAN@LISTSERV.EDUC
